Theoretical Performance Comparison of Lithium Batteries

Authors

  • Yiming Chen
  • Wenxing Zuo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/jeg8z523

Keywords:

Lithium batteries, performance, comparison.

Abstract

A traditional energy supply is unable to address the needs of sustainable development dedicated strategy, a crisis in earth’s has enhanced on the rise of power lack while mankind becomes facing that much annoyance due to natural pollution problems that are arising from energy. Precisely, this is the need for modern development of new energy and from the economic aspect that focuses on a large-scale application, efficiency, production as well as balancing other dimensions; lithium-ion batteries are deemed future most of new energy battery. The diaphragm limits the lithium-ion battery performance to some point, but traditional diaphragms have impurity many problems that make it affect the battery performance negatively. In this paper, the structure, safety and performance of lithium-ion batteries are evaluated. It is found that lithium-ion battery can enhance the porosity and polar electrolyte compatibility of the beginning polypropylene diaphragm as well as stabilizes attapulgite nanoparticles modified by the made up of polypropylene artificial membrane. Attapulgite nanoparticle cost is a significant portion of its benefits at the same time. Because attapulgite nanoparticles may improve the electrochemical kinetic reaction process and high interface resistance of polypropylene diaphragms more than lithium-ion batteries, the modified diaphragm based on surface covalent reaction technique has a significantly lower value of the polarization voltage. Also, at various C densities lithium-ion batteries can be significantly enhanced attapulgite modified poly propylene membranes. Finally, lithium-ion battery technology should have broad application prospects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Xu Xiaoxiong, Qiu Zhijun, Guan Yibiao, et al. All-solid-state lithium-ion batteries: State-of-the-art development and perspective. Energy Storage Science and Technology, 2013, 2 (4): 331-341.

Zeng Jing, Liu Sifeng. Research on aging mechanism and state of health prediction in lithium batteries. Journal of Energy Storage, 2023, 72 (A): 108274.

Lin Bixia, Zhang Yuanyuan, Li Weifeng et al. Recent advances in rare earth compounds for lithium–sulfur batteries. eScience, 2023, 100180.

Dang Guoju, Zhang Maohui, Min Fanqi. Lithum titanate battery system enables hybrid electric heavy-duty vehicles. Journal of Energy Storage, 2023, 74 (A): 109313.

Xiao Chunwu, Wang Bin, Zhao Dan, et al. Comprehensive investigation on Lithium batteries for electric and hybrid-electric unmanned aerial vehicle applications. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress. 2023, 38: 101677.

Armand, M., & Tarascon, J.-M.. Building better batteries. Nature, 2008, 451(7179), 652–657.

Goodenough, J. B., & Park, K.-S. The Li-ion rechargeable battery: a perspective. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2013, 135 (4): 1167–1176.

Lu, J., Chen, Z., Ma, Z., et al. (A review on the key issues of the lithium ion battery degradation among the whole life cycle. Sustainable Energy & Fuels, 2019, 3 (3): 512–536.

Myung, S. T., Maglia, F., Park, K. J., et al. Nickel-rich layered cathode materials for automotive lithium-ion batteries: Achievements and perspectives. ACS Energy Letters, 2016, 1 (3): 590–599.

H. Chung and B. Kang. Mechanical and thermal failure induced by contact between a Li1.5Al0.5Ge1.5(PO4)3 solid electrolyte and Li metal in an all solid-state Li cell. Chem. Mater. 2017, 29: 8611–8619.

Yong Guo, Shichao Wu, Yan-Bing He, et al. Solid-state lithium batteries: Safety and prospects, eScience, 2022, 2 (2).

Downloads

Published

13-08-2024