A Comparative Analysis of Illustris TNG and THESAN Cosmological Simulations

Authors

  • Zhiqin Ding

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/1nwht838

Keywords:

Cosmological simulations, Illustris TNG, THESAN.

Abstract

Cosmological simulations play a crucial role in understanding the evolution of the universe, offering valuable insights when compared with observational data. With advancements in computational capabilities and data-gathering techniques, simulations have evolved to model larger volumes and finer details of cosmic structures. This review compares two prominent simulations, Illustris TNG and THESAN, focusing on their algorithms and factors considered. Illustris TNG primarily employs smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH), while THESAN utilizes moving mesh hydrodynamics (MMH), each offering unique advantages in simulating different aspects of the universe. Furthermore, THESAN incorporates additional factors such as cosmological dust and sophisticated radiation transport algorithms, enhancing its accuracy in predicting early galaxies and stars. The comparison underscores the impact of algorithmic differences and the consideration of various factors on simulation accuracy. This analysis highlights the importance of understanding these specifications in designing simulations that effectively capture the complexities of the cosmos.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Mark V, Federico M, Paul T, et al. Cosmological simulations of galaxy formation. Nature Reviews Physics, 2020, 2: 42–66.

Claude A, Faucher G. Recent progress in simulating galaxy formation from the largest to the smallest scales Nature Astronomy, 2018, 2: 368-373.

Dylan N, Annalisa P, Volker S, et al. First results from the IllustrisTNG simulations: the galaxy colour bimodality. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2018, 475(1), 624-647.

Kannan R, Garaldi E, Smith A, et al. Introducing the THESAN project: radiation-magnetohydrodynamic simulations of the epoch of reionization. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2022, 511(3): 4005-4030.

Pedro C, Vladimir A, Enrique V, et al. Low-Mass galaxy formation in cosmological adaptive mesh refinement simulations: the effects of varying the sub-grid physics parameters. The American Astronomical Society. The Astrophysical Journal, 2020, 713(1).

Volker Springel E. Galilean-invariant cosmological hydrodynamical simulations on a moving mesh. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2010, 401(2): 791-851.

Rahul K, Mark V, Federico M, et al. AREPO-RT: radiation hydrodynamics on a moving mesh. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2019, 485(1): 117-149.

Xiaohui F. Observations of the first light and the epoch of reionization. 2012 National Astronomical Observatories of Chinese Academy of Sciences and IOP Publishing Ltd. Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 2012, 12(8).

Mihalas D, Mihalas B W. Foundations of radiation hydrodynamics. 1984 Oxford Univ. Press, New York, 1984, 731.

Tom A, Michael L N, Piero M. Photon-conserving radiative transfer around point sources in multidimensional numerical cosmology. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in U.S.A. The Astrophysical Journal, 1999, 523(1).

Tom A, Benjamin D. Wandelt Adaptive ray tracing for radiative transfer around point sources. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2002, 330(3): 53-L56.

Thomas H. Greif Multifrequency radiation hydrodynamics simulations of H2 line emission in primordial, star-forming clouds. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2014, 444(2), 21, 1566-1583.

Jaura S C O Gr, Klessen R S, Paardekooper J P. SPRAI: coupling of radiative feedback and primordial chemistry in moving mesh hydrodynamics. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2018, 475(2): 2822-2834.

Downloads

Published

20-08-2024

How to Cite

Ding, Z. (2024). A Comparative Analysis of Illustris TNG and THESAN Cosmological Simulations. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, 112, 277-280. https://doi.org/10.54097/1nwht838