Performance Comparison Between Traditional Internal Combustion Engines and Hybrid Powertrains
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/a5ggnc71Keywords:
Traditional engine, internal combustion engine, hybrid engine, emissions reduction, fuel efficiency.Abstract
This paper explores the performance differences between traditional internal combustion engines (ICEs) and hybrid engines. Traditional ICEs have been the cornerstone of automotive technology for over a century, operating by converting chemical energy from burning fuel into mechanical energy. Despite their widespread use, traditional ICEs are significant contributors to air pollution and global warming. In contrast, hybrid engines combine one or more electric motors with a traditional ICE, utilizing battery packs and regenerative braking to enhance fuel efficiency and reduce emissions. As society increasingly adopts hybrid vehicles due to their environmental benefits, understanding the advantages and disadvantages of both engine types is crucial. This study evaluates the energy efficiency, emissions, and power output of traditional and hybrid engines. By analyzing common driving scenarios, this paper provides a comprehensive comparison to inform consumer choices, manufacturing trends, and policies aimed at reducing the automotive industry's carbon footprint and improving economic factors related to fuel consumption. Ultimately, this research aims to contribute to the ongoing dialogue on sustainable transportation and the future of automotive engineering.
Downloads
References
[1] Wang Hanchen, Ye Yiming, Zhang Jiangfeng, et al. A comparative study of 13 deep reinforcement learning based energy management methods for a hybrid electric vehicle. Energy, 2023, 266: 126497.
[2] Sun Yijia. Comparative study on the performance of traditional engines and hybrid engines. Theoretical and Natural Science, 2023, 5: 649-657.
[3] Silberglitt Richard, Wong Anny, Bohandy S. R., et al. The global technology revolution China, in-depth analyses: Emerging technology opportunities for the Tianjin Binhai New Area (TBNA) and the Tianjin Economic-Technological Development Area (TEDA) (1st ed.). RAND Corporation, 2009.
[4] Gonzalez Cesar, Jesik, Richard L. The multi-fuel general aviation piston engine. SAE Transactions, 2000, 109: 257–282.
[5] Muralidharan M., Kumar Ajay, et al. In-cylinder combustion studies of diesel-compressed natural gas dual fuel with increasing energy fraction and its effect on emissions. SAE International Journal of Engines, 2022, 15 (5): 651-670.
[6] Shimada, Taizo, Notomi Mitsuo et al. Improvement of fuel consumption of neat biofuel diesel engine with reduced injection driving torque. SAE International Journal of Engines, 2013, 6 (3): 1509-1520.
[7] Lawler, Benjamin, Ortiz-Soto Elliott, et al. Hybrid electric vehicle powertrain and control strategy optimization to maximize the synergy with a gasoline HCCI engine. SAE International Journal of Engines, 2011, 4 (1): 1115-1126.
[8] Ikeya, Kenichiro, Takazawa Masanobu, et al. Thermal Efficiency Enhancement of a Gasoline Engine. SAE International Journal of Engines, 2015, 8 (4): 1579-1586.
[9] Nakata, Koichi, Shinichiro Nogawa, et al. Engine Technologies for Achieving 45% Thermal Efficiency of S.I. Engine. SAE International Journal of Engines, 2016, 9 (1): 179-192.
[10] Takahashi, Daishi, Nakata Koichi, et al. Combustion Development to Realize High Thermal Efficiency Engines. SAE International Journal of Engines, 2016, 9 (3): 1486-1493.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







