An Investigation of Cross-dataset Model Generalization of Convolutional Neural Network

Authors

  • Zhengping Guan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/j77b0p65

Keywords:

Transfer learning; model generalization; convolutional neural network.

Abstract

Transfer learning has become increasingly important as a method to leverage pre-trained models on new tasks, potentially saving significant training time and computational resources. Understanding how well these models generalize to new datasets is critical when people are going to use them to solve real-world problems. This research investigates the transfer learning performance of pre-trained models. Specifically, this work evaluates whether these models trained on dataset Canadian Institute for Advanced Research (CIFAR)-10 can still perform well when transferred to another dataset Self-Taught Learning (STL)-10. Both datasets share the same classes, ensuring a meaningful comparison. The models were trained for five epochs on CIFAR-10 and subsequently evaluated on STL-10. Residual Neural Network (ResNet)18 achieved a maximum accuracy of 41.54% on STL-10, while Visual Geometry Group (VGG)16 reached up to 53.36%. These results show the moderate generalization capabilities of the models and suggest that even though transfer learning is not completely ineffective, there are challenges in achieving high performance on new datasets without further fine-tuning. This study aids in comprehending model generalization and provides insight into the potential and limitations of transfer learning in real-world applications.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Rawat Waseem, Zenghui Wang. Deep convolutional neural networks for image classification: A comprehensive review. Neural computation, 2017, 29(9): 2352-2449.

[2] Li Zewen, Liu Fan, Yang Wenjie, et al. A survey of convolutional neural networks: analysis, applications, and prospects. IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems, 2021, 33(12): 6999-7019.

[3] Wang Haohan, Wu Xindi, Huang Zeyi, et al. High-frequency component helps explain the generalization of convolutional neural networks. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2020, 8684-8694.

[4] Kabkab Maya, Emily Hand, Rama Chellappa. On the size of convolutional neural networks and generalization performance. International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2016: 3572-3577.

[5] Lin Shan, Jingwei Zhang. Generalization bounds for convolutional neural networks. arXiv preprint, 2019: 1910.01487.

[6] Zhuang Fuzhen, Qi Zhiyuan, Duan Keyu, et al. A comprehensive survey on transfer learning. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2020, 109(1): 43-76.

[7] He Kaiming, Zhang Xiangyu, Ren Shaoqing, et al. Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2016: 770-778.

[8] Simonyan Karen, Andrew Zisserman. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint, 2014: 1409.1556.

[9] CIFAR-10 dataset. URL: https://www.cs.toronto.edu/~kriz/cifar.html. Last Accessed: 2024/08/08.

[10] Coates Adam, Andrew Ng, Honglak Lee. An analysis of single-layer networks in unsupervised feature learning. Proceedings of the fourteenth international conference on artificial intelligence and statistics. JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings, 2011: 215-223.

Downloads

Published

18-02-2025

How to Cite

Guan, Z. (2025). An Investigation of Cross-dataset Model Generalization of Convolutional Neural Network. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, 124, 61-65. https://doi.org/10.54097/j77b0p65