Driving Methods of the Upper Limb Rehabilitation Exoskeleton Robot

Authors

  • Shaokun Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/b2cykw22

Keywords:

Upper limb exoskeleton robot; driving mode; motor drive; pneumatic artificial muscle drive; hybrid drive.

Abstract

In recent years, the number of patients with hemiplegia has increased year by year, and the use of upper limb exoskeleton robot assisted treatment is a novel and efficient treatment method. With the continuous development of science and technology and medical level, the demand for upper limb rehabilitation exoskeleton robot is increasing, and the requirements are getting higher and higher, among which, the choice of drive mode, control mode and material are the technical focus of upper limb exoskeleton robot research. Different driving modes are used for different therapeutic purposes, treatment sites and treatment plans. According to the driving mode, the upper limb rehabilitation exoskeleton robot can be divided into three categories, namely, motor drive, pneumatic artificial muscle, hybrid drive, and motor drive is divided into PRP model drive, underdrive, Bowden line drive, and twisted rope drive. In this paper, the structure and principle of these driving methods are introduced respectively, their advantages and disadvantages are expounded, and the future development trend of the upper limb rehabilitation exoskeleton robot is prospected. So that scholars can better understand the development status of upper limb rehabilitation exoskeleton robot drive.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Wang L D, Peng B, Zhang H Q, et al. Summary of China Stroke Prevention Report 2020 [J]. Chinese Journal of Cerebrovascular Diseases, 2020, 19(02):136-144.

[2] Yao Yufeng, Pei Shuo, Guo Junlong, et al. Research review of upper limb rehabilitation robot [J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 60(11):115-134.

[3] Shen Huimin, Ge Ruikang, Ge Di, et al. Compatibility analysis of rehabilitation exoskeleton design and human-machine based on shoulder cooperative motion characteristics [J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 58(19): 34-44.

[4] Chen S, Chen Z, Yao B, et al. adaptive robust cascade force control of 1-dof hydraulic exoskeleton for human performance augmentation [J]. IEEE-Asme Transactions on Mechatronics, 2017, 22(2): 589-600.

[5] Qin Yan-ding, Fan Gade, Zhang Haoqi, et al. Design and control of upper limb rehabilitation exoskeleton robot driven by pneumatic artificial muscle [J/OL]. Journal of mechanical engineering, 2024, 1-12.

[6] Yao Yulong, Li Xianhua, Lin Fengtao, et al. Design of a hybrid drive exoskeleton robot for upper limb rehabilitation [J]. Journal of Jiamusi University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 42(01):72-76.

[7] Yi Ziyuan, Huang Pengpeng, Wang Huiyu, Yang Jing. Structure design and Simulation Analysis of upper limb rehabilitation robot [J]. Modeling and Simulation, 2023, 12(4): 4054-4064.

[8] Dragusanu M., et al., Design, Development, and Control of a Hand/Wrist Exoskeleton for Rehabilitation and Training, IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2022, 38(3), 1472-1488.

[9] https://www.zhihu.com/question/338983068/answer/796356803

[10] Chiri A., et al, Mechatronic design and characterization of the index finger module of a hand exoskeleton for poststroke rehabilitation, IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics, 2012, 17(5), 884–894.

[11] Jiang Lei. Design and control of upper limb exoskeleton rehabilitation training robot based on twisted rope drive [D]. China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), 2014.

[12] Mazzolai B, Mattoli V. Robotics: Generation soft [J]. Nature, 2016, 7617: 400-401.

[13] http//:10.16661 / j.carol carroll nki. 1672-3791.2304-5042-3366.

Downloads

Published

25-12-2024