Evaluation of Public Participation in EIA in Hong Kong: A Comparison of Government Projects and Private Sector Projects
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/hset.v26i.4017Keywords:
Environmental Impact Assessment, Public Participation, Hong Kong, Government, Private Proponent.Abstract
Conducting public participation in an environmental impact assessment (EIA) study and assuring its effectiveness is very indispensable as it acts as a scrutiny role from a third party's point of view when comes to the decision-making process. Both governmental proponents and private proponents are required to do the EIA study if their proposed projects are subject to designated projects. It is discovered that a majority of public participation in EIA studies carried out in government-run projects prudently follows the provisions as well as principles and serves as a high-interactive medium for information dissemination and exchange. In contrast, there is no significant influence of public participation organized in EIA study of private-run projects. Therefore, this paper aims at revealing the implementation of public participation in EIA responsible by different types of proponents and digging out the reasons behind it through an investigation and comparison of two representative cases from government-run projects (Lok Ma Chau Rail Spur Line Project) and private proponent-run projects (Fung Lok Wai Wetland Project) respectively. The study indicates that the compliant operation of public participation in government-run projects originates from the intention of benefiting the public as most of the projects are designed to be public infrastructure while the purpose of private components to start up a project is to seek profit, consequently resulting in the one-way and dictatorial decision-making. By tapping these voids, this paper provides a critical understanding of the disparity between the actual practice and specified criteria and attempts to establish a reference model for engineering projects that need to conduct an EIA study. This paper advocates improving the relevant system and strengthening supervision of EIA.
Downloads
References
Hung S. F. (2022) Public Participation and EIA Effectiveness: Empirical Case Studies in Hong Kong. https://www.proquest.com/openview/7ee435ba35da5c96c39ce9836d42fb6d/1.pdf?pq-
Lin R. (2013) Loopholes in the EIA regulations. https://www.inmediahk.net/%E7%92%B0%E8%A9%95%E6%A2%9D%E4%BE%8B%E6%BC%8F%E6%B4%9E%E5%A4%9A-%E5%85%AC%E7%9C%BE%E6%9C%9B%E4%BF%AE%E4%BE%8B%E5%A2%9E%E7%9B%A3%E7%AE%A1
Rowe G., Frewer L. J. (2004) Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises: A Research Agenda. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 29: 512–556.
UN. (1992) The UN Conference on Environment and Development. In: Earth Summit. Rio de Janeiro. pp. 1992.
Petts J. (1999) Public Participation and Environmental Impact Assessment. In: Petts, J. (Eds.), Handbook of Environmental Impact Assessment. Blackwell Science., Hoboken. pp. 145–197.
IAP2, (2014) IAP2’ s Public Participation Spectrum. www.iap2.org/resource/resmgr/foundations_course/IAP2_P2_Spectrum_FINAL.pdf.
Sadler B. (1996) Environmental Assessment in a Changing World: Evaluation Practice to Improve Performance: Final Report. Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, Toronto.
Marsden S. (1998) Importance of context in measuring the effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 16: 255–266.
Chanchitpricha C., & Bond A. (2013) Conceptualising the effectiveness of impact assessment processes. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 43: 65–72.
Baker D. C., & McLelland J. N. (2003) Evaluating the effectiveness of British Columbia’s environmental assessment process for first nations’ participation in mining development. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23: 581–603.
Fischer T. B. (2003) Strategic environmental assessment in post-modern times. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23: 155–170.
Bond A., Morrison-Saunders A., Stoeglehner G. (2013) Designing an effective sustainability assessment process. In: Bond, A., Morrison-saunders, A., & Howitt, R. (Eds.), Sustainability Assessment - Pluralism, Pracitice and Progresss. Oxon, Routledge. pp. 231–262.
Chanchitpricha C., Morrison-Saunders A., Bond A. (2019) Investigating the effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment in Thailand. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 37: 356–368.
Sheate W. (1996) Environmental Impact Assessment: Law & Policy Making an Impact II. Cameron May, London.
O’Faircheallaigh C. (2010) Public participation and environmental impact assessment: Purposes, implications, and lessons for public policy making. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 30: 19–27.
Morrison-Saunders A., Early G. (2008) What is necessary to ensure natural justice in environmental impact assessment decision-making? Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 26: 29–42.
Butterfoss F. D. (2006) Process evaluation for community participation for community participation. Annual Review of Public Health, 27: 323–340.
Laurian L. (2009) Trust in Planning: Theoretical and Practical Considerations for Participatory and Deliberative Planning. Planning Theory &Amp; Practice, 10: 369–391.
Brown G., & Chin S. Y. W. (2013) Assessing the Effectiveness of Public Participation in Neighbourhood Planning. Planning Practice and Research, 28: 563–588.
IAIA & IEA(UK). (1999) Principles of environmental impact assessment, best practice. https://www.iaia.org/uploads/pdf/principlesEA_1.pdf.
Biodiversity Conservation Center, (2016) Screening. http://www.biodiversity.ru/coastlearn/pp-eng/boxes/screening.html.
Hartley N., Wood C. (2005) Public participation in environmental impact assessment—implementing the Aarhus Convention. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25: 319–340.
Nadeem O., Fischer T. B. (2011) An evaluation framework for effective public participation in EIA in Pakistan. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 31: 36–47.
Pacifica F. Achiing O. (2007) Environmental impact assessment general procedures. https://orkustofnun.is/gogn/unu-gtp-sc/UNU-GTP-SC-05-28.pdf
Hu J. (2011) Public participation in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) — A case study of Hong Kong. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5774344/
Tang S. Y., Tang C. P., Lo C. W. H. (2005) Public Participation and Environmental Impact Assessment in Mainland China and Taiwan: Political Foundations of Environmental Management. Journal of Development Studies, 41: 1–32.
Bull R., Petts J., Evans J. (2010) The importance of context for effective public engagement: learning from the governance of waste. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 53: 991–1009.
Chi C. S., Xu J., Xue L. (2013) Public participation in environmental impact assessment for public projects: a case of non-participation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 57: 1422–1440.
Hasan M. A., Nahiduzzaman K. M., Aldosary A. S. (2018) Public participation in EIA: A comparative study of the projects run by government and non-governmental organizations. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 72: 12–24.
Census and Statistics Department. (2000) Hong Kong Annual Digest of Statistics. Government Printer, Hong Kong.
Environmental Protection Department. (2002) Sheung Shui to Lok Ma Chau Spur Line: Environmental Impact Assessment Report. https://www.epd.gov.hk/eia/register/report/eiareport/eia_0712001/Index.htm
Lam K. W. (2008) The Art and Science of EIA in Achieving Sustainability in a Hong Kong Transport Development Project. https://conferences.iaia.org/2008/pdf/IAIA08Proceedings/IAIA08ConcurrentSessions/CS5-11_EIA-Sustainability-Hong-Kong-Transport-Development_Lam.pdf
Environmental Protection Department. (2000) Sheung Shui to Lok Ma Chau Spur Line. Reasons for not approving the EIA Report and not issuing an Environmental Permit. https://www.epd.gov.hk/eia/register/reason/eia044.htm
Hung W. T. (2002) Implementation of Environmental Impact Assessment on Transport Infrastructure Projects in Hong Kong. Traffic and Transportation Studies.
Environmental Protection Department. (2008) Proposed Development at Fung Lok Wai, Yuen Long at Lot 1457 R.P. in DD123: Environmental Impact Assessment Report. https://www.epd.gov.hk/eia/register/report/eiareport/eia_1492008/index.html
Qi F.N. (2014) First Exploration of Public and Private Partnership in Wetland Conservation: A Case Study in Fung Lok Wai. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Science), 13: 99-104.
CH2M HILL Hong Kong Limited. (2008) EIA for Proposed Development at Fung Lok Wai. https://www.epd.gov.hk/eia/register/report/eiareport/eia_1492008/EIA%20Report/html/FLW_EIA_FIG2-5.pdf
Müller-Jökel R. (2004) Land readjustment–A Win-win-strategy for sustainable urban development. https://www.fig.net/resources/proceedings/fig_proceedings/athens/papers/ts14/TS14_3_MullerJokel.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
