Optimization Design for Suspension System Based on Response Surface Method and NCGA Algorithm
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/hset.v1i.484Keywords:
Suspension, Positioning parameters, Response surface method, NCGA, Multi-objective optimizationAbstract
For effective and quick selection of hard point coordinate parameters of suspension to improve the handling stability of vehicles, an optimization method was put forward to some certain suspension system by combining the response surface method and NCGA algorithm. A dynamics simulation model was established first to the Macpherson suspension system of some certain mini-van and the sensitivity analysis was carried out to hard point coordinates of the corresponding suspension to find the coordinate parameters whose sensitivities are higher; moreover, an approximate mathematical model was established between the wheel alignment parameters and the selected coordinate parameters in accordance with the response surface method and the corresponding accuracy verification was carried out; and the positioning parameters were grouped rationally and the unified objective function was established by utilizing the direct weighting method; in addition, optimization design was carried out to the established objective function by combining the neighborhood cultivation genetic algorithm (NCGA). Results indicate that the optimized positioning parameter variables are reduced in different degrees so as to further improve the handling stability of vehicles and verify some certain effectiveness of our methods.
Downloads
References
Yersin Rhyme Pal. Automotive chassis-engineering principles [M]. translated by ZHANG Hongxin and YU Zhuoping. Beijing: Popular Science Press, 1992: 150-176.
Feng Jinzhi, YANG Tao, ZHENG Songlin. Multi-objective Optimization for Suspension Structure Hard Points Based on NSGA-II Algorithm [J]. Automobile Technology, 2014, (12): 5-8.
Ding Fei, HAN Xu, LIU Guiping, et al. Hardpoints Sensitivity Analysis and Multi-objective Optimization of Suspension Guiding Mechanism [J]. Automotive Engineering, 2010, 32(2): 137-142.
Chen Jun. MSCADAMS technology and engineering analysis example [M]. Beijing: China Water & Power Press, 2008: 126-156.
Li Weiping, WANG Shidong, ZHOU Bing, et al. Macpherson Suspension Parameter Optimization Based on Response Surface Method and NSGA-II Algorithm [J]. Journal of Hunan University (Natural Sciences), 2011, 38(6): 27-32.
Hu Longfei, LIU Quankun, WANG Chengyong, et al. Optimal Design of Aluminum Alloy Flat-plate Extrusion Process Based on the Response Surface Model [J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2008, 19(13): 1630-1633.
Sui Yunkang, YU Huiping. Improvement of response surface method and its applications in engineering optimization [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2011: 4-12.
Liu Weixin. Mechanical Optimal Design [M]. 2nd Edition. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 1994: 230-231.
JD Schaffer. Multiple Objective Optimization with Vector Evaluated Genetic Algorithm [J]. Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 1984: 93-100.
CM Fonseca, PJ Fleming. Genetic Algorithms for Multi-objective Optimization: Formulation Discussion and Generalization[C]. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Genetic Algorithms, 1993: 416-423.
J horn, N Nafpliotis, DE Goldberg. Multi-objective Optimization Using the Niched Pareto Genetic Algorithm[R]. Technical Report IIIiGAL Report 93005, 1993.
K Deb, S Agrawal, APratap, et al. A Fast Elitist Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm for Multi-Objective Optimization: NSGA-II[R]. KanGAL Report 200001, 2000: 182-197.
S Watanabe, T Hiroyasu, M Miki. Neighborhood Cultivation Genetic Algorithm for Multi-Objective Optimization Problems [J]. Proceedings of the Forth Asia-Pacific Conference on Simulated Evolution and Learning (SEAL), 2002: 198-202.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







