Research on the application of electrode materials for batteries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/hset.v32i.5184Keywords:
electrode materials, energy storage technologies, preparation technology, reaction mechanism.Abstract
In the world, ecological environment and energy problems seriously restrict the sustainable development of each country and society. Therefore, it is essential to eliminate fossil energy dependence and develop and utilise new energy, especially in electric vehicles. This requires the use of secondary batteries to achieve efficient energy storage. In this paper, several potential energy storage technologies Ni-HM, Li-ion and PEMFC, are compared, and the application prospect, existing problems and the primary performance of these three battery technologies are analysed. This paper examines the standard preparation technology, reaction mechanism, background and advantages and disadvantages of these three kinds of batteries. Then the problems faced by the application of these three battery technologies, including specific energy, energy density, specific power, energy storage cost, cycle life, energy efficiency, safety, etc., are analysed, and through the main performance comparison of these three battery technologies, to provide a new idea in the battery area. Through the analysis and comparison of these batteries, the Li-ion battery has the greatest all-around performance, so it is also the optimal solution to solve environmental and energy problems. Secondly, Ni-MH batteries in all aspects of the commission are very general; the current technology still lacks competitiveness, and many vital areas need further research. Finally, the PEMFC have significant advantages in energy density, energy storage cost, and specific energy, so this technology is a potential technology worthy of further study.
Downloads
References
G. L. Zhu, C. Z. Zhao, J. Q. Huang, C. X. He, J. Zhang, S. H. Chen, L. Xu, H. Yuan, Q. Zhang. (2019) Fast charging lithium batteries: recent progress and future prospects. Small, 15, 1805389.
J. B. Quinn, T. Waldmann, K. Richter, M. Kasper, M. Wohlfahrt-Mehrens. (2018) Energy density of cylindrical Li-ion cells: a comparison of commercial 18650 to the 21700 cells. J. Electrochem. Soc., 165, A3284-A3291.
X. Zou, P. Xiong, J. Zhao, J. Hu, Z. Liu, Y. Xu. (2017) Recent research progress in non-aqueous potassium-ion batteries. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 19, 26495-26506.
C. Thomas. (2009) Fuel cell and battery electric vehicles compared. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 34: 6005-6020.
Nobuhirofurukawa. (1996) Hydrogen-absorbing alloys for nickel-metal hydride batteries. Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science, 1: 378-382.
NOTTEN P, HOKKELING P. (1991) Double-phase hydride foroming compounds: a new class of highly electrocatalytic materials. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 138: 1877-1885.
OVSHINSKY S R, FETCENKO M A, ROSS J. (1993) A nickel metal hydride battery for electric vehicles. Science, 260: 176-181.
B. Dunn, H. Kamath, J. M. Tarascon. (2011) Electrical energy storage for the grid: a battery of choices. Science, 334, 928-935.
Kang, Park, S., & Ju, H. (2014). Effects of type of graphite conductive filler on the performance of a composite bipolar plate for fuel cells. Solid State Ionics, 262, 332–336.
Ouyang, Huang, J., Wang, H., Liu, J., & Zhu, M. (2017). Progress of hydrogen storage alloys for Ni-MH rechargeable power batteries in electric vehicles: A review. Materials Chemistry and Physics, 200, 164–178.
Zou, Xiong, P., Zhao, J., Hu, J., Liu, Z., & Xu, Y. (2017). Recent research progress in non-aqueous potassium-ion batteries. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics: PCCP, 19(39), 26495–2656.
Sharma, & Pollet, B. G. (2012). Support materials for PEMFC and DMFC electrocatalysts—A review. Journal of Power Sources, 208, 96–119.
Perrot, Gonon, L., Bardet, M., Marestin, C., Pierre-Bayle, A., & Gebel, G. (2009). Degradation of a sulfonated aryl ether ketone model compound in oxidative media (sPAEK). Polymer (Guilford), 50(7), 1671–1681.
Mohseninia, Kartouzian, D., Eppler, M., Langner, P., Markötter, H., Wilhelm, F., Scholta, J., & Manke, I. (2020). Influence of Structural Modification of Micro‐Porous Layer and Catalyst Layer on Performance and Water Management of PEM Fuel Cells: Hydrophobicity and Porosity. Fuel Cells (Weinheim an Der Bergstrasse, Germany), 20(4), 469–476.
Cano, Banham, D., Ye, S., Hintennach, A., Lu, J., Fowler, M., & Chen, Z. (2018). Batteries and fuel cells for emerging electric vehicle markets. Nature Energy, 3(4), 279–289.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
