Evolution of The Policy For The Protection of Intangible Cultural Heritage In Xinjiang
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/hset.v42i.7086Keywords:
Intangible cultural heritage, Xinjiang, Ethnic Minorities, Heritage Protection, Policy Changes.Abstract
This paper composes the policy change process of intangible cultural heritage protection in Xinjiang, starting from the real problems faced by Xinjiang, reflecting the policy change process objectively and realistically, proposing a De- ideologization research perspective, and expanding the academic research on intangible cultural heritage in Xinjiang. By compiling the policy changes in the protection of intangible cultural heritage in Xinjiang and sorting out the world-class, national, and autonomous lists of intangible cultural heritage in Xinjiang, this paper draws the following conclusions: First, from a longer historical process, the policy changes in the protection of intangible cultural heritage in Xinjiang can be roughly divided into four stages: the lack of attention before the reform and opening-up period, the initial attention during the early reform and opening-up period, and the gradual attention during the exploration period of the reform and opening-up period. The first stage is the lack of attention before the reform and opening up, the initial attention at the beginning of the reform and opening up, the gradual attention at the exploration period of the reform and opening up, and the high attention at the period of systematic standardization and protection. Second, the intangible cultural heritage protection in Xinjiang is characterized by large regional differences, concentrated in Yili, Kashgar, Tacheng, Bayin, and other regions; the types are mainly folk music and traditional dance.
Downloads
References
Blake, J. (2000) “On defining the cultural heritage,” International and Comparative Law Quarterly, 49(1), pp. 61–85.
Rex Nettleford, Migration. Transmission and Maintenance of the Intangible Heritage, Museum International, vol.56,2004, p.78-83.
Arizpe, L. (2004) “Intangible Cultural Heritage, diversity and coherence,” Museum International, 56(1-2), pp. 130–136.
Wend Wendland, Intangible Heritage and Intellectual Property, Museum International, (1-2), vol.56,2004, p.97-107.
D.F.Ruggles, H.Silverman, Intangible Heritage Embodied[M],Springer New York,2009.
Kurin, R. (2004) “Safeguarding intangible cultural heritage in the 2003 UNESCO Convention: A critical appraisal,” Museum International, 56(1-2), pp. 66–77.
Demotte, R. (2004) “National Policies Concerning Intangible Cultural Heritage: The example of Belgium's French Community,” Museum International, 56(1-2), pp. 174–179.
Jongsung, Y. (2004) “Korean Cultural Property Protection Law with regard to Korean Intangible Heritage,” Museum International, 56(1-2), pp. 180–188.
Morsi, A. (2005) “Research and Preservation Projects on Intangible Heritage,” Museum International, 57(1-2), pp. 61–66.
Londrès, C. (2004) “The Registry of Intangible Heritage: The Brazilian experience,” Museum International, 56(1-2), pp. 166–173.
Ye, Fangfang (2014). A new paradigm of classification and protection of intangible cultural heritage of ethnic minorities under the threshold of law: the case of Kazakhs in Xinjiang. Journal of Xinjiang University (Philosophy - Humanities and Social Sciences Edition) (05), 133-137.
Liu Ying. (2018). Research on cultural policy in Xinjiang in the context of the evolution of China's cultural policy. Practical Matters (03), 106-112.
Wang Jimang. (2013). A study of two-way interaction between government and people in ethnic culture preservation: A case study of Uzbek ethnic township in Mubi County, Changji Prefecture, Xinjiang. Journal of Central University for Nationalities (Philosophy and Social Science Edition) (04), 156-160.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







