Research on Data Governance for Maximizing Enterprise Efficiency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/hset.v4i.851Keywords:
Data Governance, D&A system, AHP-CRITIC, SRLmax-BPM model.Abstract
In an era where organizations are increasingly relying on data to perform their business, the ability of different companies to manage and analyze data will have a significant impact on their efficiency. In this paper, we develop a model to measure the current level of maturity of ICM's data and analytics (D&A) systems and optimize it to maximize the potential of its data assets. Based on the three critical components of personnel, technology, and process, we take ICM requirements as the starting point. After comprehensively considering the current situation of the industry and enterprise needs, an indicator system is built to measure the D&A system. Then, it is used AHP-CRITIC subjective and objective comprehensive empowerment, which determines the weight of each index accordingly. It is carried out the evaluation and analysis of the maturity of the D&A system and finally concluded that the maturity of the system is 0.879, and technology is the key influencing factor. Then this paper uses the System Readiness Level Index from a technical point of view, which includes the Technology Readiness Level index to measure the technological maturity and the integration readiness of the technology integration index, which can comprehensively optimize technical indicators. To maximize the potential of digital assets, we built the SRLmax model under resource-related constraints, equipped with a business process performance management (BPM) indicator system that comprehensively considered people and process components. Finally, we passed the SRLmax-BPM model to the D&A system. After comprehensive optimization, the optimized score is 25.16% higher than the original model.
Downloads
References
Wenqing Xie, Wenjuan Wu. The global economy continues to decline, and port production has not yet recovered—the semi-annual report on the development of global ports [J]. China Shipping Weekly, 2020(40):35-37.
Zhang Qiang, He Kai, Wang Xuefeng. Research on port performance evaluation based on big data analysis [J]. Journal of Chongqing Jiaotong University (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 38(05): 66-73.
Zhimin Ni, Xiuli Gao. Research on the Efficiency Evaluation and Influencing Factors of Port Logistics in Guangdong Province——Empirical Analysis Based on DEA-Tobit Model [J]. Journal of Guangdong Ocean University, 2017,37(05):11-16.
Pengnan Yang, Jingmin Hou, Xubo Zhao, Han Li. Big data analysis platform for port production scheduling [J]. Port Technology, 2017(05):22-25+30.
Limei Lin. Research on Comprehensive Evaluation and Improvement Strategies of Rizhao Port Logistics Efficiency [D]. Shandong University of Finance and Economics, 2021. DOI: 10.27274/d.cnki.gsdjc.2021.000611.
Yiming Jian, Jinlong Zhang. Application of FAHP to determine the weight of supply chain performance evaluation indicators [J]. Journal of Central China Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2005(02): 190-194.DOI: 10.19603/j.cnki.1000 -1190.2005.02.014.
Xiaobin Zhang, Yuliang Fu, Shunsheng Wang, Qingqing Zhao. Evaluation of urban comprehensive water saving level based on AHM-CRITIC empowerment [J]. People's Yangtze River, 2021, 52(08): 113-119. DOI: 10.16232/j. cnki.1001-4179.2021.08.017.
Kaiyuan Zheng, Xiaohua Xiang. Water quality evaluation model of Xiaoxingkai Lake based on AHM-CRITIC empowerment [J]. Water Saving Irrigation, 2020(09):79-83.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







