The Performance Comparison between PoSpace and PoW

Authors

  • Zheng Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/hset.v57i.9993

Keywords:

Cryptocurrency; Consensus Algorithms; Chia; Bitcoin; Proofs of Work; Proofs of Space.

Abstract

The consensus algorithm of Bitcoin, namely proof-of-work (PoW), has been criticized for its high energy consumption and centralization of mining power. PoW needs a lot of processing power to execute cryptographic problems and verify network transactions. In contrast, Chia's consensus mechanism is based on proofs-of-space (PoSpace), which utilizes disk space rather than computing power. PoSpace involves generating a large amount of verifiable storage space on the network and requires less energy consumption than PoW. This paper presents a comparative analysis of the algorithms used by Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Chia. The paper simulates the PoW and PoSpace processes by Java and compares both mechanisms' memory, CPU usage, and time consumption using VisualVM. The experiment results show that PoSpace costs less space and time resources than PoW. The former is more energy-efficient and decentralized.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Huynh, A.N.Q., Duong, D., Burggraf, T., Luong, H.T.T. and Bui, N.H., 2022. Energy consumption and Bitcoin market. Asia-Pacific Financial Markets, 29(1), pp.79-93.

John, K., O'Hara, M. and Saleh, F., 2022. Bitcoin and beyond. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 14, pp.95-115.

Xie, M., Liu, J., Chen, S. and Lin, M., 2022. A survey on blockchain consensus mechanism: research overview, current advances and future directions. International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics, (ahead-of-print).

Shrimali, B. and Patel, H.B., 2022. Blockchain state-of-the-art: architecture, use cases, consensus, challenges and opportunities. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 34(9), pp.6793-6807.

Xiong, H., Chen, M., Wu, C., Zhao, Y. and Yi, W., 2022. Research on progress of blockchain consensus algorithm: a review on recent progress of blockchain consensus algorithms. Future Internet, 14(2), p.47.

Nakamoto, S., 2008. Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Decentralized business review, p.21260.

Truong, T., 2022. Circular Business Model for Worn Out SSDs Using Proofs of Space and Time (Doctoral dissertation, Worcester Polytechnic Institute).

Cohen, B. and Pietrzak, K., 2019. The chia network blockchain. vol, 1, pp.1-44.

Abusalah, H., SNACKs for Proof-of-Space Blockchains.

Stollenga, M.F., 2022. Embracing Hellman: A Simple Proof-of-Space Search consensus algorithm with stable block times using Logarithmic Embargo. Cryptology ePrint Archive.

Downloads

Published

11-07-2023

How to Cite

Wang, Z. (2023). The Performance Comparison between PoSpace and PoW. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology, 57, 148-153. https://doi.org/10.54097/hset.v57i.9993