An Analysis of Valuation Differences Between A-share and Hong Kong Stock Markets from the Perspective of Investor Behavior
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/g9r1p606Keywords:
A-share premium, investor sentiment, trading activity, capital flow.Abstract
With the deepening integration of global financial markets, the long-standing "AH share premium" phenomenon—where A-shares of cross-listed companies are typically priced higher than their Hong Kong counterparts—remains a key focus, even as mechanisms like Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect narrow market gaps. Traditional explanations centered on market segmentation have weakened amid enhanced connectivity, shifting attention to investor behavior differences as a critical driver. This study focuses on NetEase (600900.SH/09999.HK) and attempts to explore the behaviors related to the AH share premium from three dimensions: investor sentiment, trading activity, and capital flow. The choice of NetEase as a case has certain particularities. As a leading internet company, its businesses cover fields such as gaming and media that are familiar to the public. A-share retail investors pay high attention to it, while Hong Kong stock institutions focus more on its global competitiveness. This difference may make the impact of behavioral factors more prominent. By analyzing the transaction data and sentiment indicators from 2015 to 2024, this study can not only deepen the understanding of the stock price formation mechanism but also provide more practical decision - making references for investors in the market.
Downloads
References
[1] Ba S, Zhu H. Causes and convergence paths of AH share premium. Journal Of Financial Research, 2018, 61 (5): 112-126.
[2] Bailey W, Jagtiani J. Foreign ownership restrictions and stock prices in emerging markets. Journal Of Financial Economics, 2024, 35 (2): 103-123.
[3] Chan K, Menkveld A J, Yang Z. Price limits and liquidity: evidence from China's stock markets. Journal Of Financial Economics, 2023, 137 (3): 744-767.
[4] Cheng B, Pan A, Li Y. Market segmentation, investor sentiment, and AH share premium. Accounting Research, 2017, 22 (3): 76-83.
[5] De Long J B, Shleifer A, Summers L H, Waldmann R J. Noise trader risk in financial markets. Journal Of Political Economy, 2022, 98 (4): 703-738.
[6] Gervais S, Odean T. Learning to be overconfident. Review Of Financial Studies, 2021, 14 (1): 1-27.
[7] Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 1979, 47 (2): 263-291.
[8] Li X, Chen G, Kim K A. Cultural differences in risk perception and cross-border stock price differences. Journal Of International Money and Finance, 2021, 116 (8): 102346.
[9] Lu T, Liu L. Investor sentiment and asset pricing: evidence from AH share premium. Economic Research Journal, 2022, 16 (2): 135-150.
[10] Pan Y, Xiao J, Dai Y. Liquidity differences and AH share premium: a perspective from trading mechanisms. Management World, 2019, 78 (8): 77-90.
[11] Wang Q, Zhang H, Zhao X. Arbitrage barriers and AH share premium dynamics. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 2023, 79 (8): 102045.
[12] Zhang L, Liu C. Information asymmetry and cross-market stock price differences: evidence from AH shares. Journal Of Banking & Finance, 2022, 143 (8): 106502.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Academic Journal of Management and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

