Analysis of the Possible Issues Caused by the Application of GenAI in Education and the Corresponding Solutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/4axspe57Keywords:
GenAI, AI in Education (AIED), Hallucination, Unfairness, PrivacyAbstract
This paper examines the multifaceted problems arising from the integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) in educational systems, focusing on three critical dimensions: hallucination, unfairness, and privacy. First, the study interrogates the epistemic crisis triggered by GenAI’s propensity for hallucination—generating plausible but factually inaccurate content—arguing that its uncritical adoption in education risks entrenching misinformation and undermining intellectual autonomy in the post-truth era. Second, it critiques systemic unfairness rooted in global asymmetries, where GenAI entrenches data colonialism by disproportionately benefiting technologically advanced regions while marginalizing under-resourced communities. Third, the paper explores privacy violations through the lens of Foucault’s digital panopticon, demonstrating how GenAI-enabled surveillance—via behavioral tracking, cognitive profiling, and data monetization—transforms classrooms into sites of pervasive control. To address these challenges, the study proposes interdisciplinary solutions, and by synthesizing critiques of epistemic reliability, global justice, and privacy erosion, this paper contributes to urgent debates on balancing GenAI’s transformative potential with its risks to the field of education an increasingly algorithm-driven world.
Downloads
References
[1] Shan, P. AI and the future of education. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2023, p.17.
[2] Ibid., p.16.
[3] Hajji, S. Educational sovereignty and artificial intelligence challenges: The case of Morocco. In F. Roumate (Ed.), Artificial intelligence in higher education and scientific research: Future development. International Institute of Scientific Research, 2023, p.104.
[4] World Economic Forum. Schools of the future: Defining new models of education for the fourth industrial revolution, 2020. https://www.weforum.org/publications/schools-of-the-future-defining-new-models-of-education-for-the-fourth-industrial-revolution/.
[5] Senior, J., & Gyarmathy, É. AI and developing human intelligence. Routledge, 2022, p.12.
[6] Ibid.
[7] UNESCO. Guidance for generative AI in education and research. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 2023, p.36.
[8] Shan, P. AI and the future of education. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2023, p.23.
[9] Clark, D. Artificial intelligence for learning: Using AI and generative AI to support learner development. Kogan Page Limited, 2024, p.207.
[10] Merchant, B. Business: Who’s helping train AI? Almost all of us. Los Angeles Times, 2023, August 26.
[11] Writing Across the Curriculum. (2023, Winter). AI-resistant assignments. Carleton College. https:// www. carleton.edu/writing/resources-for-faculty/working-with-ai/ai-resistant-assignments/.
[12] UNESCO. Guidance for generative AI in education and research. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 2023, p.15.
[13] Baudrillard, J. Simulacra and Simulation (S. F. Glaser, Trans.). University of Michigan Press, 1994, p.79.
[14] Hernandez, M. AI-resistant assignments? Show student thinking and promote better writing with UChicago-supported tools. Academic Technology Solutions, University of Chicago, 2023. https://academictech.uchicago.edu/2023/02/08/ai-resistant-assignments-show-student-thinking-and-promote-better-writing-with-uchicago-supported-tools/.
[15] Writing Across the Curriculum. (2023, Winter). Ethical issues in AI. Carleton College. https:// www. carleton.edu/writing/resources-for-faculty/working-with-ai/ethical-issues/.
[16] UNESCO. Guidance for generative AI in education and research. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 2023, p.14.
[17] National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). Falling through the net: A survey of the “Have Nots” in rural and urban America. The Digital Divide. MIT Press, 1995, p.42.
[18] Turnitin is a software used by over 16,000 academic institutions worldwide to spot plagiarized text.
[19] Mathewson, T. G. AI detection tools falsely accuse international students of cheating. The Markup, 2023. https://themarkup.org/machine-learning/2023/08/14/ai-detection-tools-falsely-accuse-international-students-of-cheating.
[20] Shan, P. AI and the future of education. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2023, p.206.
[21] Bhise, A., Munshi, A., Rodrigues, A., & Sawant, V. Overview of AI in education. In P. Churi, S. Joshi, M. Elhoseny, & A. Omrane (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in higher education: A practical approach. CRC Press, 2023, p.55.
[22] Clark, D. Artificial intelligence for learning: Using AI and generative AI to support learner development. Kogan Page Limited, 2024, p.208.
[23] UNESCO. Guidance for generative AI in education and research. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 2023, p.15.
[24] Ibid.
[25] Sandler, R. L. (Ed.). Ethics and emerging technologies, 2014, p.23. https: // doi. org/ 10.1057/ 978113 7349088.
[26] Foucault, M. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (2nd ed.). Vintage Books, 1995, p.201.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Academic Journal of Management and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

