Comparative Analysis of Concrete Strength Control in China, USA and Europe

Authors

  • Shenghan Gao
  • Shaojie Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/ajst.v7i2.12249

Keywords:

Statistical tests, Test criteria, Intensity control, Comparative analysis.

Abstract

This paper compares and analyses the differences in concrete strength control regulations in China, the United States and Europe. By comparing the inspection and acceptance standards of different countries' regulations, the differences in curing and solidification of standard specimens and statistical acceptance are analyzed. The principles and mechanisms of concrete strength control regulations in different countries are studied, and the similarities and differences in concrete strength control between China, the United States and Europe are compared. The results show that although there are some similarities, there are still significant differences in sampling frequency, acceptance standards, inspection effectiveness and strength control among different countries. Through comparing and analyzing the regulations of different countries, this paper better grasps the principles and experiences of different countries in concrete strength control, providing a global perspective and promoting the reasonable formulation of concrete strength inspection regulations in various regions for researchers and practitioners in the concrete industry.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Xin, H.-H. Sampling and testing techniques [M]. Beijing: China Metrology Press, 2005.

China Academy of Building Research. Design code for concrete structures: GB 50010-2010 [S]. Beijing: China Construction Industry Press.,2010.

China Academy of Building Research. Concrete strength test and assessment standard: GB/T 50107-2010 [S]. Beijing: China Construction Industry Press, 2010.

Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary: ACI 318-19[S].Michigan: American Concrete Institute,2019.

Evaluation of Strength Test Results of Concrete: ACI214R11[S]. Michigan:American Concrete Institute, 2011.

Concrete-Specification, performance, production and conformity: BS EN0 206-2013+A2-2021 [S].BS EN, 2021.

Standard Practice for Making and Curing Concrete Test Specimens in the Field:ASTM C31/C31M-2022[S]. American Society for Testing Materials,2022.

Standard Specification for Mixing Rooms, Moist Cabinets, Moist Rooms, and Water Storage Tanks Used in the Testing of Hydraulic Cements and Concretes:ASTM C511/C511M-2021[S]. American Society for Testing Materials, 2021.

Testing Hardened Concrete Part 2: Making and curing specimens for strength tests: BS EN 12390-2[S].BS EN, 2019.

Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens:ASTM C39/C39M-2021[S]. American Society for Testing Materials, 2021.

Testing Hardened Concrete Part 3:Compressive strength of test specimens: BS EN 12390-3[S].BS EN, 2019.

China Railway Research Institute Group Co. Railway Concrete Strength Inspection and Assessment Standard:TB 10425-2019 [S]. Beijing: China Railway Press Limited, 2019.

Tian Guanfei, Zhang Renyu, Han Sufang. Analysis and Interpretation of Concrete Strength Inspection and Evaluation Standards [M]. Beijing: China Construction Industry Press, 2018.

Evaluation of Strength Test Results of Concrete:ACI214R11[S].Michigan:American Concrete Institute, 2011.

LI Yongsheng, JIANG Lixue, WANG Zhuolin. Comparative analysis of concrete strength acceptance criteria in Chinese and foreign standards[J]. Construction Technology (in Chinese and English),2022,51(9):1-8.

Wang Tiecheng. Concrete strength test evaluation method [J]. Progress of water conservancy and hydropower science and technology,2001,21(2):53-55.

Downloads

Published

27-09-2023

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Gao, S., & Wang, S. (2023). Comparative Analysis of Concrete Strength Control in China, USA and Europe. Academic Journal of Science and Technology, 7(2), 120-127. https://doi.org/10.54097/ajst.v7i2.12249