A Preliminary Study on The Causes of the "Triple-peak" La Niña During 2020-2022
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/xmj1es79Keywords:
La Niña; Sea surface temperature; Anomalous southeasterlies; Ocean- atmosphere interaction.Abstract
The 2020-2022 triple-peak La Niña is the first consecutive three-year La Niña event in this century. In order to investigate the similarities and differences between this event and the other observed bimodal and triple events, this study uses synthetic and regression analysis, empirical orthogonal function decomposition, and mixed layer heat budget diagnosis to compare other events with this one in terms of location of anomalous negative sea surface temperature (SST), anomalous wind direction, and mixed layer heat budget. In the previous bimodal events, the centers of SST negative anomalies were both in the (5°S-5°N, 180°-120°W) region; there were anomalous northerly and westerly winds east of 140°W, and the negat precipitation anomalies were distributed along north of the equator. In contrast, the peak position of the second negative SST anomaly in this event is more eastward and southward; the anomalous easterlies continue from 120°E to the eastern boundary of the basin, and there is an anomalous southerlies in the eastern part of the basin. To further investigate the role of the anomalous easterlies and southerlies, this study calculates the mixed layer heat budget in key region. Corresponding to the latitudinal (longitudinal) wind anomalies, the latitudinal (longitudinal) temperature advection dominates the robust difference between the bimodal event and this triple-peak event. The anomalous easterlies and southerlies in the equatorial Pacific are favorable to the appearance of the third La Niña year in this event. This study is important in understanding the dynamics of triple-peak La Niña events, and will facilitate the forecast of such event.
Downloads
References
[1] Zeng-Zhen Hu, Arun Kumar, Yan Xue, and Bhaskar Jha. Why were some La Niñas followed by another La Niña? Climate Dynamics, 42:1029–1042, 2014.
[2] Fei Zheng, Lisha Feng, and Jiang Zhu. An incursion of off-equatorial subsurface cold water and its role in triggering the “double dip” La Niña event of 2011. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 32:731–742, 2015.
[3] Pedro N DiNezio, Clara Deser, Alicia Karspeck, Stephen Yeager, Yuko Okumura, Gokhan Dan- abasoglu, Nan Rosenbloom, Julie Caron, and Gerald A Meehl. A 2 year forecast for a 60–80% chance of La Niña in 2017–2018. Geophysical Research Letters, 44(22):11–624, 2017.
[4] Xian Wu, Yuko M Okumura, Clara Deser, and Pedro N DiNezio. Two-year dynamical predictions of enso event duration during 1954–2015. Journal of Climate, 34(10):4069–4087, 2021.
[5] Xianghui Fang, Fei Zheng, Kexin Li, Zeng-Zhen Hu, Hongli Ren, Jie Wu, Xingrong Chen, Weiren Lan, Yuan Yuan, Licheng Feng, et al. Will the historic southeasterly wind over the equatorial pacific in march 2022 trigger a third-year La Niña event?, 2023.
[6] Shineng Hu and Alexey V Fedorov. Cross-equatorial winds control El Niño diversity and change. Nature Climate Change, 8(9):798–802, 2018.
[7] Shang-Ping Xie, Qihua Peng, Youichi Kamae, Xiao-Tong Zheng, Hiroki Tokinaga, and Dongxiao Wang. Eastern pacific itcz dipole and enso diversity. Journal of Climate, 31(11): 4449–4462, 2018.
[8] Andrew M Chiodi and Don E Harrison. El Niño impacts on seasonal us atmospheric circulation, temperature, and precipitation anomalies: The olr-event perspective. Journal of Climate, 26 (3):822–837, 2013.
[9] Nathaniel C Johnson and Yu Kosaka. The impact of eastern equatorial pacific convection on the diversity of boreal winter El Niñoteleconnection patterns. Climate Dynamics, 47 (12): 3737–3765, 2016.
[10] Wenju Cai, Simon Borlace, Matthieu Lengaigne, Peter Van Rensch, Mat Collins, Gabriel Vecchi, Axel Timmermann, Agus Santoso, Michael J McPhaden, Lixin Wu, et al. Increasing frequency of extreme El Niño events due to greenhouse warming. Nature climate change, 4(2):111–116, 2014.
[11] Ken Takahashi, Aldo Montecinos, Katerina Goubanova, and Boris Dewitte. Enso regimes: Reinterpreting the canonical and modoki El Niño. Geophysical research letters, 38(10), 2011.
[12] Nathaniel C Johnson and Shang-Ping Xie. Changes in the sea surface temperature threshold for tropical convection. Nature Geoscience, 3(12):842–845, 2010.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Academic Journal of Science and Technology

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.








