Quantum Entanglement: From EPR Paradox to Modern Applications

Authors

  • Haoyang Dong

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/8yfeff58

Keywords:

quantum entanglement, EPR paradox, Bell's theorem, quantum teleportation.

Abstract

Quantum entanglement was once a subject of intense philosophical debate and regarded as a puzzling theoretical anomaly. However, it has now been empirically validated and is widely recognized as a fundamental feature of quantum mechanics. This review traces its development in chronological order, beginning with the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen (EPR) paradox, which raised profound questions about the completeness of quantum theory, and John Stewart Bell’s subsequent theorem, which established a measurable framework to verify entanglement’s non-local nature. The discussion then turns to contemporary experimental and applied domains where entanglement serves as a critical resource. Notable examples include quantum teleportation, entanglement-enhanced metrology, quantum radar, and emerging quantum energy devices such as quantum batteries. The transition from theoretical dispute to practical application underscores how entanglement now enables tangible technologies—ranging from ultra-secure communication networks to highly precise sensors. Furthermore, potential interdisciplinary applications in fields such as quantum biology are also explored, suggesting new pathways for innovation. This review aims to bridge foundational concepts with current technological advances, illustrating the continuing impact of quantum entanglement on both scientific understanding and real-world engineering.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Northup TE, Blatt R. Quantum information transfer using photons. Nat Photonics. 2024, 8 (5):356-363.

[2] Yin J, Cao Y, Li YH, et al. Satellite-based entanglement distribution over 1200 kilometers. Science. 2017, 356 (6343):1140-1144.

[3] Li X. A Brief Discussion on EPR Paradox and Quantum Entanglement. Technology Innovation and Application. 2015, (29):74.

[4] Guimaraes MS, De Lima EF, De Assis RJ, et al. Introduction to Bell's Inequality in Quantum Mechanics. Universe. 2024, 10(10): 396.

[5] Yi XX, Shen HZ, Wang LC. Quantum Entanglement and Bell's Inequality and Their Applications in Quantum Information Processing. Physics Experimentation. 2022, 42 (12):1-9.

[6] Manzano D. A Short Introduction to the Lindblad Master Equation. AIP Advances. 2020, 10 (2):025106.

[7] Pirandola S, Bardhan BR, Gehring T, Weedbrook C, Lloyd S. Advances in Quantum Radar and Quantum Illumination. Phys Rev Lett. 2020, 124 (1):012001.

[8] Zhang Q, Xu F, Chen YS, Peng CZ, Pan JW. Quantum Satellite Communications: The Micius Mission. Science. 2018, 362 (6411):178-181.

[9] Le TP, Levinsen J, Modi K, Parish MM, Pollock FA. Quantum Battery Charging Advantage. J Phys Commun. 2021, 5 (9):095009.

[10] Zhang C, Li Y, Hu X, Liu B, Xiang Y, He Q, et al. Randomness versus Nonlocality in Multiple-Input and Multiple-Output Quantum Scenario. Phys Rev Lett. 2025, 134 (9):090201.

[11] Arute F, Arya K, Babbush R, et al. Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Nature. 2019, 574 (7779):505-510.

[12] Weinstein YS, Hellberg CS, Levy J. Parameters of Pseudorandom Quantum Circuits. Phys Rev A. 2008, 78 (5):052332.

Downloads

Published

13-03-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Dong, H. (2026). Quantum Entanglement: From EPR Paradox to Modern Applications. Academic Journal of Science and Technology, 19(3), 78-83. https://doi.org/10.54097/8yfeff58