Quantitative Analysis of Process Parameter Effects on Deposition Layer Geometry in DED Additive Manufacturing

Authors

  • Junjie Dai
  • Chengyu Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/pv41bn37

Keywords:

Directed Energy Deposition, Deposition Layer Geometry, Process Parameters, ANOVA

Abstract

In laser-directed energy deposition (DED), the geometric characteristics of individual deposited layers—height (H) and width (W)—fundamentally determine the dimensional accuracy of final components. This study quantifies the effects of three key process parameters—laser power, scanning speed, and powder feed rate—on H and W to establish a quantitative basis for dimensional control. A full factorial design (5×4×3) was employed, generating 60 single-track samples. Three-way ANOVA was applied to identify significant factors, quantify contribution ratios, and examine interactions. Results show excellent model fit (H: R²=96.47%, W: R²=97.51%). For height H, powder feed rate dominates (57% contribution), followed by scanning speed (31%), while laser power shows no significant effect (P>0.05). For width W, laser power dominates (60%), followed by scanning speed (28%). A significant interaction exists between scanning speed and powder feed rate for width (P<0.001): at low speeds (<11.5 mm/s), increasing feed rate increases W; at high speeds (>11.5 mm/s), the opposite occurs. These findings reveal distinct parameter dominances—feed rate controls height, power controls width—providing a quantitative foundation for targeted parameter optimization in DED processes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] The State Council. Made in China 2025 [R]. Beijing: The State Council of the People's Republic of China, 2015.

[2] Száva I, Vlase S, Lucaci C, et al. Dimensional Methods Used in the Additive Manufacturing Process[J]. Polymers, 2023, 15(8): 1876.

[3] Kekana M, Akinlabi E, Madushele N. Application of ANOVA Method to Optimize Selective Laser Melting Parameters for AlSi12 Parts[J]. Applied Sciences-Basel, 2024, 14(2): 567.

[4] Azimi B, Malekmohammadi H, Asgari M, et al. Optimization of FDM Process Parameters for PEEK Medical Devices: Effect on Dimensional Accuracy and Mechanical Properties[J]. Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing, 2025, 9(1): 23.

[5] OFweek. Analysis of Global and Chinese Additive Manufacturing Industry Market Status and Development Trends in 2022 [R]. Shenzhen: OFweek, 2023.

[6] Farias F, Batalha G, Boggio F, et al. Challenges and Opportunities for Industrial Adoption of Directed Energy Deposition: A Critical Review[J]. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2024, 130(5): 2123-2145.

[7] Svetlizky D, Das M, Zheng B, et al. Directed Energy Deposition (DED) Additive Manufacturing: Physical Characteristics, Defects, and Challenges[J]. Materials Today, 2021, 49: 271-295.

[8] Xu L, Cao H, Liu H, et al. Process Parameter Optimization for Laser-Arc Hybrid Additive Manufacturing of Aluminum Alloy [J]. Micromachines, 2024, 15(3): 345.

[9] Kladovasilakis N, Kontodina T, Charalampous P, et al. Influence of Process Parameters on the Mechanical Properties and Dimensional Accuracy of Metal Additive Manufacturing Parts: A Review[J]. Progress in Additive Manufacturing, 2021, 6(4): 685-703.

[10] Nikolaos K, Paschalis C, Ioannis K, et al. Q3D: A Complete Solution for Quality Control and Inspection in Additive Manufacturing Processes[J]. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 2024, 30(6): 1087-1103.

[11] Charalampous P, Kostavelis I, Tzovaras D. Non-Destructive Quality Control Methods in Additive Manufacturing: A Survey[J]. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 2020, 26(4): 777-790.

[12] Maucher C, Gerold J, Möhring C H. Towards Efficient Powder Quality Control in Additive Manufacturing via an In Situ Capable Device and Methodology Leveraging Multispectral Machine Learning[J]. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 2024, 119: 443-451.

[13] Grzegorz B, Joanna W, Andrzej P, et al. Methodology for the Quality Control Process of Additive Manufacturing Products Made of Polymer Materials[J]. Materials, 2021, 14(9): 2202.

Downloads

Published

03-03-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Dai, J., & Zhang, C. (2026). Quantitative Analysis of Process Parameter Effects on Deposition Layer Geometry in DED Additive Manufacturing. Academic Journal of Science and Technology, 20(1), 12-20. https://doi.org/10.54097/pv41bn37