EARSeg3D: An Automated Segmentation Method for Ear Canal Impressions

Authors

  • Ye Cheng
  • Sheng Chen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/kq4pqt81

Keywords:

Hearing Aids, Deep Learning, Semantic Segmentation, Ear Canal Impression.

Abstract

Hearing impairment is a significant global public health issue. Hearing aids, as critical devices for improving the auditory experience of individuals with hearing loss, require personalized customization that decisively affects wearing comfort and acoustic performance. Traditional ear canal impression fabrication relies on manual procedures, which are time-consuming, cause patient discomfort, and introduce subjective errors. Although deep learning has achieved remarkable progress in medical image analysis, its application in the core steps of hearing aid customization—namely, automated semantic understanding and three-dimensional structural analysis of ear canal impressions—remains limited. To address this research gap, this paper proposes EARSeg3D, an end-to-end semantic segmentation method for ear canal impression point clouds based on PointNet++. Targeting the complex geometric characteristics of ear canal morphology, the method introduces a Local Context Fusion Module (LCFM) built upon PointNet++’s hierarchical feature learning framework. By encoding relative spatial positional relationships and feature gradients among points within local neighborhoods, LCFM enhances the network’s ability to perceive the intricate geometric topology of the ear canal. Following a six-class semantic labeling standard, this study partitions ear canal impression point clouds into six semantic regions: ear canal tip, middle ear canal, ear canal base, redundant material, concha cavity, and concha cymba. Ablation study results on a self-constructed dataset show that with the LCFM module, the model achieves a mean Intersection over Union (mIoU) of 92.31% and an overall accuracy (OA) of 83.36%, which are 1.18 and 1.07 percentage points higher than the baseline model, respectively. Visualization results further demonstrate that the method effectively mitigates jagged segmentation boundaries, achieving smoother and more precise segmentation in curved regions of the ear canal and at the junctions between different anatomical structures.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] HAILE L M, ORJI A U, REAVIS K M, et al. Hearing loss prevalence, years lived with disability, and hearing aid use in the United States from 1990 to 2019: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study [J]. Ear and hearing, 2024, 45(1): 257-67.

[2] ORGANIZATION W H. World report on hearing [M]. World Health Organization, 2021.

[3] LAUNER S, ZAKIS J A, MOORE B C. Hearing aid signal processing [J]. Hearing aids, 2016: 93-130.

[4] PANAYI N C, EFSTATHIOU S, CHRISTOPOULOU I, et al. Digital orthodontics: Present and future [J]. AJO-DO Clinical Companion, 2024, 4(1): 14-25.

[5] CHUA K W D, YEO H K H, TAN C K L, et al. A novel ear impression-taking method using structured light imaging and machine learning: A pilot proof of concept study with patients’ feedback on prototype [J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2024, 13(5): 1214.

[6] DORAN S. 3D Printing Based Silicone Earmold Mold Fabrication for Pediatric Hearing Aids [D]; WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE, 2025.

[7] QI C R, SU H, MO K, et al. Pointnet: Deep learning on point sets for 3d classification and segmentation; proceedings of the Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, F, 2017 [C].

[8] QI C R, YI L, SU H, et al. Pointnet++: Deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space [J]. Advances in neural information processing systems, 2017, 30.

[9] TOGNOLA G, PARAZZINI M, SVELTO C, et al. Design of hearing aid shells by three dimensional laser scanning and mesh reconstruction [J]. Journal of biomedical optics, 2004, 9(4): 835-43.

[10] CORTEZ R, DINULESCU N, SKAFTE K, et al. Changing with the times: applying digital technology to hearing aid shell manufacturing [J]. Hearing Review, 2004, 11(3): 30-41.

[11] CHUNG K. Challenges and recent developments in hearing aids: Part II. Feedback and occlusion effect reduction strategies, laser shell manufacturing processes, and other signal processing technologies [J]. Trends in Amplification, 2004, 8(4): 125-64.

[12] ZOUHAR A, SLABAUGH G G, UNAL G, et al. Generalized rigid alignment of 3d ear impression models [Z]. Google Patents. 2011

[13] ZOUHAR A, ROTHER C, FUCHS S. Semantic 3-D Labeling of Ear Implants using a Global Parametric Transition Prior [J]

Downloads

Published

22-04-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Cheng, Y., & Chen, S. (2026). EARSeg3D: An Automated Segmentation Method for Ear Canal Impressions . Academic Journal of Science and Technology, 20(3), 40-44. https://doi.org/10.54097/kq4pqt81