Corporate Sustainability and Firm Value: Evidence from China

Authors

  • Yiqi Yang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/fbem.v11i1.12125

Keywords:

ESG; Corporate Sustainability; Corporate Value; Tobin’s Q.

Abstract

In recent years, sustainable development has become a hot topic globally, and more and more people are realizing the crucial importance of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors in corporate decision-making and long-term development. Using the sample from China, we testify whether corporate sustainability have effect on firm value. We find that corporate sustainability improves firm value, as it reduces the information risks and operating risks. ESG is a win-win measure for both regulators and listed firms, therefore there is a shared interest in ensuring that ESG considerations are integrated into business practices. In theory we enrich the literature on the economic conse-quences of corporate sustainability and complement to the literature on deter-minants of firm value. In practical significance, this study provides implica-tions for both government and listed firms to focus on ESG.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Luo, K., & Wu, S. (2022). Corporate sustainability and analysts' earnings forecast accuracy: Evidence from environmental, social and governance ratings. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(5), 1465-1481.

Buallay, A. (2019). Is sustainability reporting (ESG) associated with performance? Evidence from the European banking sector. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 30(1), 98-115.

Zhou, G., Liu, L., & Luo, S. (2022). Sustainable development, ESG performance and company market value: Mediating effect of financial performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(7), 3371-3387.

Drempetic, S., Klein, C., & Zwergel, B. (2020). The influence of firm size on the ESG score: Corporate sustainability ratings under review. Journal of Business Ethics, 167, 333-360.

Garcia, A. S., Mendes-Da-Silva, W., & Orsato, R. J. (2017). Sensitive industries produce better ESG performance: Evidence from emerging markets. Journal of cleaner production, 150, 135-147.

Lehkonen, H., & Heimonen, K. (2015). Democracy, political risks and stock market performance. Journal of International Money and Finance, 59, 77-99.

Hooper, V., Sim, A. B., & Uppal, A. (2009). Governance and stock market performance. Economic Systems, 33(2), 93-116.

Verheyden, T., Eccles, R. G., & Feiner, A. (2016). ESG for all? The impact of ESG screening on return, risk, and diversification. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 28(2), 47-55.

Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global finance journal, 38, 45-64.

Shakil, M. H. (2021). Environmental, social and governance performance and financial risk: Moderating role of ESG controversies and board gender diversity. Resources Policy, 72, 102144.

Shen, H. B., Tian, C., & Zong, Y. (2021). Does corporate social responsibility affect stock market performance of listed companies? An empirical test based on Wind Rating data. Journal of Southeast University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition).

Henriksson, R., Livnat, J., Pfeifer, P., & Stumpp, M. (2019). Integrating ESG in portfolio construction. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 45(4), 67-81.

Francis, J. R., Neuman, S. S., & Newton, N. J. (2019). Does tax planning affect analysts' forecast accuracy?. Contemporary Accounting Research, 36(4), 2663-2694.

Wang, S., Wei, C., & Han, L. (2017). Do business relationships affect the accuracy of analyst earnings forecasts? Evidence from China. Asia‐Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 46(1), 155-177.

Downloads

Published

19-09-2023

Issue

Section

Articles