The Impact of Equity Incentives on the Performance of Listed Companies

Authors

  • Huatian Xia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/fbem.v11i2.12586

Keywords:

Employee equity incentive; Executive equity incentive; Company performance; Principal-agent theory.

Abstract

With the formal implementation of the Administrative Measures for Equity Incentives of Listed Companies, the scope of equity incentives for listed companies in China has been expanding, and the equity incentive system has been gradually improved. Among them, executive equity incentive and employee equity incentive are two important subjects in the incentive plan, and their respective impacts on corporate performance have also attracted much attention, which part has a greater impact, and whether the two are opposed has become a question discussed by many scholars. Based on human capital theory and entrusted agent theory, this paper selects A-share listed companies that implemented equity incentive plans from 2011 to 2020 as a sample, and uses a fixed-effect regression model to investigate the impact of different equity incentives on company performance. It is found that executive equity incentive can have a positive impact on the company's performance, and executive equity incentive enables them to join the enterprise management decision-making as the "master", share the surplus value of the enterprise with the owner, promote the enthusiasm and creativity of senior executives, reduce the agency cost between shareholders and executives, and meet the needs of long-term development of enterprises. Second, the effect of employee equity incentives is better than that of executives. Employees can only receive the benefits of equity incentives by working hard to meet the conditions for exercise (unlocking). As the most direct participants and executors in the company's business activities, employees have the motivation and ability to work hard to achieve equity incentive conditions and realize their own benefits.  That is, the incentive effect of large-scale employee equity incentive is better, and the effect on the performance of listed companies is more significant.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Li Bin, Sun Yue-jing. Managers' Ownership Incentive, Restriction Level and Enterprises' performance——Empirical Analysis Based on the Private Listed Companies. China Soft Science, 2009(08):119-131.

Wei Gang. Incentives for Top-Management and Performance of Listed Companies. Economic Research Journal, 2000, (03):32-39+64+80+2+4.

Yan Ji-chao, Liu Rui-han. A Literature Review on Managerial Ownership and Firm Value: Based on the Perspective of Berle&Means Research Paradigm. Journal of Capital University of Economics and Business, 2013, 15(6): 96-102.

Yan Ruo-sen. Literature Review on Optimal Governance of Equity Concentrated Corporations based on Double Principal-agent Theory. Modern Economic Science, 2006, 28 (4): 90-95.

Hanson R C, Song M H. Managerial ownership, board structure, and the division of gains in divestitures. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2000, 6( 1) : 55-70.

Tzioumis K. Why do firms adopt CEO stock options? Evidence from the United States. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2008, 68(1) :100-111.

Chou Jian-zhong, Huang Zhi-zhong, Xie Jun. Can Equity Incentive Deter the Tunneling of Large Shareholders. Business and Management Journal, 2008, (17): 50-55.

Manso G. Motivating innovation. Journal of Finance, 2011, 66(5): 1823-1860.

Burns N, Mctier B C, Minnick K. Equity-incentive compensation and payout policy in Europe. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2015, (30): 85-97.

Xu Ning, Xu Xiangyi. Equity Incentives granted to Supervisor, Collision Orientation and Corporate Governance Restriction-Empirical Research Based on Listed Companies' Panel Data in China. Business and Management Journal, 2012, (1): 52-60.

Liu Bao-hua, Wang Lei. Performance-based Equity Incentives, Exercise Rights Vesting Restriction, and Corporate Innovation. Nankai Business Review, 2018, 21(1): 17-27,38.

Chen Wen-qiang, Jia Sheng-hua. Equity Incentive, Agency Costs and Corporate Performance——Based on the Analysis Framework of Double Principal-agent Problem. Modern Economic Science, 2015, 37(2): 106-113, 128.

Lu Tong, Dang Yin. Corporate Governance and Innovation: Differences among Industry Categories. Economic Research Journal, 2014,49(06):115-128.

Liang Shang-kun. Will the Incentive Intensity of Equity Compensation Affect Enterprise's Cost Stickiness. The Journal of World Economy, 2016,39(06): 168-192.

JIANG Ying-bing, YU Ya-ping. Who Are More Direct Innovators? Core Employee Equity Incentives and Innovation Output. Business and Management Journal, 2017,39(03): 109-127.

Downloads

Published

11-10-2023

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Xia, H. (2023). The Impact of Equity Incentives on the Performance of Listed Companies. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 11(2), 179-187. https://doi.org/10.54097/fbem.v11i2.12586