The Construction of Securities Public Interest Litigation System from the Perspective of Protecting Small and Medium Investors

Shan Li

doi:10.54097/fbem.v11i3.13207

Authors

Shan Li

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/fbem.v11i3.13207

Keywords:

Securities public interest litigation, Protection of small and medium investors, Public interests, Private interests.

Abstract

Securities violations have dual consequences, both damaging public and private interests. The emergence of securities public interest litigation can bridge the gap between "private remedies" and "public enforcement" in the governance paths. However, due to the lack of legal provisions and judicial practice, the establishment of the securities public interest litigation system and its operation need to be explored. This article, from the perspective of protecting small and medium investors, discusses the goals and challenges of constructing the securities public interest litigation system. It also examines the necessity of using public interest litigation to restrain the abuse of controlling shareholders' rights and protect the interests of small and medium investors. Regarding the obstacles faced by current securities public interest litigation, the main issues include the questionable legislative positioning and the need for clarity in specific procedures. In the process of exploring the construction of the securities public interest litigation system, this article focuses on discussing the scope of application of public interest litigation, the selection of suing entities, and the allocation of burden of proof. It aims to enhance the understanding of the public and relevant departments regarding the construction of the public interest litigation system, while highlighting its significant role in protecting the rights and interests of small and medium investors, effectively promoting the protection of public interests and the lawful performance of regulatory authorities in the securities market, and safeguarding the healthy development of the securities market.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Liu Jia,Liu Cang,”Analysis of Litigation Cases by the Investment Service Center: Protecting the Rights and Interests of Small and Medium Investors,” Financial and Accounting Monthly. Vol. 16, 2023.

Fan Weiguo,”Securities Public Interest Litigation: Derivative Logic, Theoretical Interpretation, and Institutional Formation,” Journal of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Vol. 6, 2021 .

Fan Weiguo,”From Support for Litigation to Public Interest Litigation: Dilemmas and Solutions for the Protection of Investor Rights under the New Securities Law,” Journal of Financial Law, Vol. 2, 2020.

Liu Guofeng, Rui Yuehua,”Proposal to Establish a Securities Public Interest Litigation System,” China Securities Journal, March 7, 2017, A04.

Hu Weilie, Tian Kai,”Research on Pilot Cases of Administrative Public Interest Litigation Initiated by Procuratorial Organs,” Journal of Administrative Law Research,Vol. 2, 2017.

Lin Yiming,” Challenges in Legislative Issues of Administrative Public Interest Litigation in China and Judicial Responses,” East Law Journal, Vol. 2, 2018.

Yang Zhihong,”Institutional Reflection on the Expansion of Public Interest Litigation Subjects -- Taking Prosecuting Authorities as the Starting Point of Public Interest Litigation Plaintiffs,” Qinghai Social Sciences, Vol. 4, 2018 .

Ding Baotong,” Basic Types and Procedural Paths of Civil Public Interest Litigation,” Journal of Legal Science (Northwest University of Political Science and Law),Vol. 2, 2014.

China Securities Regulatory Commission, http://www.csrc.gov.cn/csrc/c105752/c7399269/content.shtml. Last accessed April 20, 2023.

Lian Yuqiang,”Issues and Countermeasures: Empirical Analysis of the Connection between Securities Administrative Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice,”published in the Journal of Shanghai Political and Law Institute (Series on the Rule of Law), Vol. 4, 2018.

Liu and others suing Company A, Xian, Yun and others for the dispute of securities false statement liability, Shanghai Higher People's Court (2016) Shanghai No. 01 Civil Case No. 166 civil judgment.

Chen Linji,” Securities Public Interest Litigation: Legal Analysis and Institutional Construction,” Journal of Hubei University of Economics, Vol. 2, 2020.

Yu Deming, Cao Ruixuan,” The Construction of China's Civil Securities Public Interest Litigation System,” Chinese Procuratorate, Vol.6, 2020.

Zhang Jun, ”Introduction of Public Interest Litigation Mechanism in Securities Tort Judicial Relief,” in People's Judicature, Vol. 2, 2015.

Pan Shenming, ” Civil Public Interest Litigation from a Comparative Law Perspective,” Law Press, 2011.

John Rawls, ”A Theory of Justice,” translated by He Huaibao, He Baogang, and Liao Shenbai, Peking University Press 2009.

Ning Li'ang, ” Analysis of the Feasibility of Initiating Public Interest Litigation: Analysis from a Local Perspective,” in Political and Legal Studies, Vol. 4, 2012.

Liu Shuilin and Gao Feng, ”The Theoretical Confirmation of the Establishment of China's Securities Public Interest Litigation System,” in Journal of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Vol. 6, 2014.

Zhang Liming, ” The Procuratorate Should Not be the Plaintiff in Environmental Public Interest Litigation,”in Legal Studies, Vol. 6, 2011.

Xiao Jianhua, ”Procedural Safeguards for Modern Litigation - Based on the Background of the Amendment of the Civil Procedure Law in 2012,” in Comparative Law Research, Vol. 5, 2012.

Supreme People's Court, Provisions on Evidence in Civil Proceedings (Revised in 2008), Article 4.

Wang Xiuwei,”Reflection and Reconstruction of the Allocation of Evidentiary Burden in Environmental Civil Public Interest Litigation in China,” in Law Review, Vol. 2, 2019.

Zhang Weiping,”The Institutionalization and Implementation of the Principle of Civil Public Interest Litigation Research,” in Tsinghua Law Journal, Vol. 4, 2013.