Research on Market Definition of Digital Economy and Case Analysis: Based on the Perspective of Bilateral Market

Authors

  • Ziyi Xing

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/fbem.v12i1.13764

Keywords:

Digital Economy; Bilateral Market; Related Market Definition; Cross Network Externality; Asymmetric Price Structure.

Abstract

 In recent years, with the continuous development of digital economy, regulating the healthy development of platform economy has become an important issue. China's relevant government departments call for a clear adherence to the principles of “fair competition”, and for the strengthening of anti-monopoly and the establishment and improvement of market supervision to adapt to the development of the digital economy. In the process of anti-monopoly law enforcement, the relevant market definition is usually regarded as the logical starting point of analyzing the competitive behavior. Compared with traditional enterprises, platform enterprises have bilateral market characteristics such as “cross network externality” and “asymmetric price structure”, which face challenges in defining their relevant markets. This article first clear the bilateral market meaning, then discusses the platform enterprise bilateral market characteristics, and sort out the scholars in recent years about “define a single or multiple market” “assumed monopolist test is applicable”point of view, finally analyzed the “Sherpa's Abused Market Dominance” “Tangshan Renren Company v.Baidu Case” “Qihoo360 v.Tencent Case” three Chinese anti-monopoly law enforcement cases. The aim is to further discuss how to better combine the theoretical investigation and case analysis of qualitative and quantitative analysis to define the relevant market more accurately.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

XIONG Yan. A survey of the theory of two-sided market in industrial organization.Journal of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law,2010(04):49-54+144.

Rochet J C, Tirole J. Defining two-sided markets. Mimeo, IDEI, Toulouse, France, January, 2004.

Armstrong M.Competition in two‐sided markets. The RAND Journal of Economics, 2006, 37(3): 668-691.

HUANG Min Li.Two-sided markets and the evolution of market conformation.Journal of Capital University of Economics and Business,2007(03):43-49.

LI Jian.Market definition of anti-monopoly law under two-sided market:law and economics in the Baidu case.Studies in Law and Business,2010,27(05):38-45.

XU Guang Yao.Adjustment of anti-monopoly law on abuse of dominant position in two-sided market in internet industry : comment on Qihoo v.Tencent case.Law Review, 2018, 36(01): 108-119.

Rochet J C, Tirole J. Two‐sided markets: a progress report. The RAND Journal of Economics, 2006, 37(3): 645-667.

Evans D S, Noel M. Defining antitrust markets when firms operate two-sided platforms. Colum. Bus. L. Rev., 2005: 667.

Filistrucchi L. A SSNIP test for two-sided markets: the case of media. Available at SSRN 1287442, 2008.

LIN Ping,LIU Feng Bo.Recent progress and case review of relevant market definition research in bilateral markets.Research on Financial and Economic Issues, 2014 (06): 22-30.

JIANG Yan Bo.On the judicial dilemma and countermeasures to define relevant markets in internet industry:from the perspective of the two-sided markets. The Jurist, [13] 2012 (06): 58-74+175-176.

SUN Jin,ZHONG Ying Chang.New definition of the relevant product market in internet platform industry.Modern Law Science, 2015, 37(06):98-107.

TANG Yao Jia,TANG Chun Hui.Digital platform antitrust related market definition.Research on Financial and Economic Issues,2021(02):33-41.

Filistrucchi L, Geradin D, Van Damme E, et al. Market definition in two-sided markets: Theory and practice. Journal of Competition Law and Economics, 2014, 10(2): 293-339.

Downloads

Published

16-11-2023

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Xing, Z. (2023). Research on Market Definition of Digital Economy and Case Analysis: Based on the Perspective of Bilateral Market. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 12(1), 87-94. https://doi.org/10.54097/fbem.v12i1.13764