Applying Economic Principles to Improve the Quality of Forestry Carbon Sinks Trading in China

Authors

  • Qing Zheng

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/fbem.v12i2.14768

Keywords:

Carbon sink trading; Externalities; Resource curse; Substitutes; Information asymmetry.

Abstract

The issue of climate change has been continuously concerned by countries around the globe, and with the signing of a series of documents, such as the Paris Agreement, people are gradually realizing that the climate issue is not just an environmental issue, but is also gradually turning into a new way for developed countries to control the world. The core solution to climate warming is to reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in the air. Therefore, China's establishment of the carbon peak and carbon neutral targets shows the importance it attaches to the ecological environment, and at the same time, it also demonstrates the style of a great power and its responsibility. One of the ways to achieve the dual-carbon goal is to trade carbon sinks, especially forestry carbon sinks. By applying relevant economic principles such as externalities and the resource curse, raising the awareness of individual consumers about carbon sinks, allowing enterprises to contract their own forests for carbon compensation, and improving the relevant systems for forestry carbon trading, the quality of carbon trading can be improved and the major obstacles it faces can be overcome.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Zhou Hongchun: Development and inspiration of the world carbon trading market, China Soft Science, (2009) No.12 p.39.

Cao Xianlei, Cheng Baodong: Current Situation, Problems and Suggestions for the Development of the Market for Forestry Carbon Sink CER Projects in China, Environmental Protection, 46(2018) No.15, p.27.

Zhang Yan, Li Feng, Li Yuan: Study on the forestry carbon sink market and the development of forestry carbon trading in Hainan under the background of carbon neutrality, Journal of Hainan University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 39(2021) No.03, p.35.

Y. Tian: Study on the correlation between low-carbon "three farmers" and carbon trading offset mechanism--an analysis based on carbon trading to drive the low-carbon development of rural revitalisation, Price Theory and Practice, (2019) No.08, p.46.

K. Wick and Bulte E, 2009, "The Curse of Natural Resources", Annual Review of Resource Economics, 1(1): 139-155.

Jinghua Zhang: Natural resources as a "gospel" or a "curse": an institutional-based analysis, Shanghai Economic Research, 01 (2008) No.01, p.9.

Yang Bowen: "Resource curse" or "system failure"? --An analysis based on China's forestry carbon trading system, China Rural Observation, (2021) No.05, p.51. [8] Zhu Guangqin, "The Curse of Resources or the Failure of the System".

Zhu Guangqin, Han Hao: A forest ecological benefit compensation model based on regional carbon trading, Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 38 (2010) No.10, p.109.

Lu Siheng: The Development Paradox of Resource Countries under the Perspective of Institutional Transmission: "Resource Curse" and "Path Dependence", Academic Exploration, (2019) No.08, p:59.

Wang Shuhua, Shen Jiazhuang: Discussion on the model of "ant garden" under the perspective of "carbon finance" and garden integration--Taking ant forest as an example, Construction Economy, 42 (2021) No.S1, p.419.

Liu Min, Hu Angang: China to build the world's largest forestry carbon market (2020-2060), Journal of Xinjiang Normal University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 43 (2022) No.04, p.89.

Downloads

Published

06-12-2023

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Zheng, Q. (2023). Applying Economic Principles to Improve the Quality of Forestry Carbon Sinks Trading in China. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 12(2), 97-100. https://doi.org/10.54097/fbem.v12i2.14768