Quantitative Policy Evaluation under the Vision of Energy Vehicle Development Strategy

Takes Anhui Province as An Example

Authors

  • Yuxin Wang
  • Zihan Wang
  • Ying Zang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/fbem.v5i1.1569

Keywords:

New energy vehicle development strategy, Policy status quo PMC index structure equation model.

Abstract

Advocating by the concept of "double carbon era", China's long-term unremitting efforts for energy conservation and emission reduction. In 2021, the central government clearly mentioned focusing on strategic emerging industries such as new energy vehicles on the 14th Five-Year Plan. First of all, this paper obtains relevant policies, and then establishes policy evaluation indicators from multiple dimensions such as policy nature, timeliness, function and action, so as to build a PMC index model for quantitative evaluation of policy quality and response validity. Secondly, this paper takes Anhui province as the research area and uses the combination of stratified sampling and quota sampling to collect questionnaires. According to the results of the questionnaire survey, the structural equation model was constructed to explore the influence of the new energy vehicle policy on the purchase intention of potential consumers. Finally, the relevant conclusions were obtained through the above analysis, in order to help promote and optimize the strategy of the new energy vehicle nationwide.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ju Jun, Chen Yue, Yu Yanchun. Suggestions on application and Promotion of New energy Vehicles in China based on the target of German experience [J]. Transportation energy saving and environmental protection, 2021,17 (05): 27-32 + 36.

Gao Wei, Hu Xiaoyue. New energy vehicle policy effect: scale or innovation intermediary?[J]. Scientific Research Management, 2020,41(04):32-44.DOI:10.19571/j.cnki.1000-2995.2020.04.004.

Liu Jinzhou, Fang Haifeng, Liu Wanxiang. Local new energy vehicle policy implementation effect evaluation and adjustment suggestions [J]. Automotive Industry Research, 2018 (12): 4-11.

Zhao Citizen, Lu Jingqin, Wang Yangdong, Wu Yongjie. Research on the Transformation Efficiency of Scientific and technological Achievements under the Background of Internet [J]. Soft Science, 2021,35(08):45-50.DOI:10.13956/j.ss.1001-8409.2021.08.07.

Wang Huifang, Shi Shuling. Research on the Policy Status and Optimization Strategy of New Energy Vehicles in China [J]. Modern industrial economy and Information technology, 2021,11(09):96-98.DOI:10.16525/j.cnki.14-1362/n.2021.09.41.

Yuan Ni, Zhang Zhending, Fang Xu. Research on the Status quo and Development Trend of New Energy Vehicle Policy in China under the New Situation [J]. Time Automobile, 2021 (05): 93-94.

Gong Yuda. China's New Energy Vehicle Policy Review and Outlook [J]. Transmission Power Research, 2018,2 (32): 220.

Yao LAN. In November 2021, the production and sales of new energy vehicles are consistent with more than 400,000 units [J]. Automobile Horizontal, 2022 (01): 107-108.

Liya Chen, Minmin Chen. Development and prospect analysis of new energy vehicles [J]. Southern Agricultural Machinery, 2021,52 (23): 102-105.

Li Fangsheng, Zhao Shijia, Hu Youbo. Key problems and countermeasures for the internationalization development of China's new energy vehicle industry [J]. Scientific Management Research, 2021,39(05):72-78.DOI:10.19445/j.cnki.15—1103/g3.2021.05.011.

Wang Shanjin, Cheng Yuan. The Current situation and Development Trend of New energy vehicles in Europe [J]. Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy Conservation, 2021,12 (02): 135-149.

Yang Yi, Li Peng. Problems and countermeasures existing in the development of New energy vehicles in China [J]. The Business Economy, the 2022(03):55-56+129.DOI:10.19905/j.cnki.syjj1982.2022.03.017.

Downloads

Published

12-09-2022

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Wang, Y., Wang, Z., & Zang, Y. (2022). Quantitative Policy Evaluation under the Vision of Energy Vehicle Development Strategy: Takes Anhui Province as An Example. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 5(1), 169-177. https://doi.org/10.54097/fbem.v5i1.1569