The Impact of Inter-city Cooperation on Local Economy and Environment: Evidence from the Greater Bay Area


  • Zhuoyue Pan



Inter-city cooperation, GDP, Environment, IV approach, China.


Regional cooperation between cities is of great importance to economic development and environmental protection. However, there appear to be fewer papers in the economic literature on the actual result of cooperation between cities quantitatively. Therefore, this paper, theoretically, studies how local governments strategically interact with each other in improving environmental quality and local economy. To this end, we, specifically, collect data before building a fixed effects model and adopting instrumental variables. Empirical evidence shows that inter-city cooperation in the Greater Bay Area has a positive impact on local economy and environment. This paper provides insightful comments on the economic and environmental effects of cooperation between cities, which is of great relevance to government, enterprises, and residents. We substantially advance the understanding of the impact of inter-city cooperation, which benefits the regional cooperation in China further.


Download data is not yet available.


Yang, W., Fan, F., Wang, X., & Yu, H. (2021). Knowledge innovation network externalities in the Guangdong–Hong Kong–Macao Greater Bay Area: borrowing size or agglomeration shadow?. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 1-18.

Zhang, X., Shen, J., & Gao, X. (2021). Towards a comprehensive understanding of intercity cooperation in China’s city-regionalization: A comparative study of Shenzhen-Hong Kong and Guangzhou-Foshan city groups. Land Use Policy, 103, 105339.

Hu, X., Wang, X. C., Ni, L., & Shi, F. (2022). The impact of intercity economic complementarity on HSR volume in the context of megalopolization. Journal of Transport Geography, 98, 103222.

Douglass, M. (2002). From global intercity competition to cooperation for livable cities and economic resilience in Pacific Asia. Environment and urbanization, 14(1), 53-68.

Memon, M. A., Pearson, C., & Imura, H. (2005). Inter-city environmental cooperation: the case of the Kitakyushu initiative for a clean environment. International Review for Environmental Strategies, 5(2), 531.

Nakamura, H., Elder, M., & Mori, H. (2011). The surprising role of local governments in international environmental cooperation: The case of Japanese collaboration with developing countries. The Journal of Environment & Development, 20(3), 219-250.

Zeng, J., Pagàn-Castaño, E., & Ribeiro-Navarrete, S. (2022). Merits of intercity innovation cooperation of environment-friendly patents for environmental regulation efficiency. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 121404.

Pearl, J. (2000). Models, reasoning and inference. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 19(2).

Caner, M., & Hansen, B. (2004). INSTRUMENTAL VARIABLE ESTIMATION OF A THRESHOLD MODEL. Econometric Theory, 20(5), 813-843.

Altonji, J. G., Elder, T. E., & Taber, C. R. (2005). An evaluation of instrumental variable strategies for estimating the effects of catholic schooling. Journal of Human resources, 40(4), 791-821.

Heckman, J. J. (2008). Econometric causality. International statistical review, 76(1), 1-27.

Li, Y., Lee, Y., Wolfe, R. A., Morgenstern, H., Zhang, J., Port, F. K., & Robinson, B. M. (2015). On a preference‐based instrumental variable approach in reducing unmeasured confounding‐by‐indication. Statistics in Medicine, 34(7), 1150-1168.



20 September 2022

How to Cite

Pan, Z. (2022). The Impact of Inter-city Cooperation on Local Economy and Environment: Evidence from the Greater Bay Area. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 5(2), 67–71.