Is It Radical or Feasible for Drugs to Become A Global Public Good?

Authors

  • Jingye Wu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/xqaes386

Keywords:

Pharmaceutical, Market, Monopoly, Competition, Global health.

Abstract

This paper mainly discusses whether drugs can become the global public good. By analyzing the industry chain of pharmaceutical companies, which can understand the industrial structure and investment demand of pharmaceuticals. When drugs change from for-profit products to public goods, the overall pharmaceutical environment will be affected, and the capital investment and market environment will change. Because the production of drugs is accompanied by high production costs, it is also important to maintain the intellectual property rights of drugs, which will lead to the formation of anti-competitive temporary monopoly in the market. Such monopolies lead to excessive concentration of power and technology, so national governments intervene to maintain a competitive market environment and potentially promote some medicines as global public goods. However, there will be many problems when all drugs are called global public goods. These contents will be outlined in detail in this paper. The article concludes with the conclusion that drugs can become public goods under certain and appropriate circumstances.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Sparke, M. and Williams, O. 2024. COVID and structural cartelisation: market-state-society ties and the political economy of Pharma. [Online]. [Accessed 25 February 2024]. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13563467.2024.2304180

Danzon, P., M. 2014. Competition and Antitrust Issues in the Pharmaceutical Industry. [Accessed 25 February 2024]. Available from: https://faculty.wharton.upenn.edu/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Competition-and-Antitrust-Issues-in-the-Pharmaceutical-IndustryFinal7.2.14.pdf

Dahdah, M. 2022. Between philanthropy and big business: the rise of MHealth in the global health market. Journal of Development and change, 53 (2), pp.376–95.

Alshrari, A., S. 2022. Innovations and development of COVID-19 vaccines: a patent review. Journal of infection and public health, 15 (1), pp.123–31.

Clarke, J., L. and Evenett, S., J. 2003. The deterrent effects of national anticartel laws: evidence from the international vitamins cartel. Journal of Antitrust Bulletin, 48(3), pp.689-726.

Cernak, S. 2013. Expanded HSR Rules Require Reporting of Pharmaceutical Patent Exclusive Licenses, All Exclusive Deals Called "Potentially Reportable" By FTC. [Accessed 25 February 2024]. Available from: http://www.natlawreview.com/article/expanded-hsr-rules-require-reporting-pharmaceutical-patentexclusive-licenses-all-ex!

Lerner, A. 1934.The Review of Economic Studies. [Accessed 25 February 2024]. Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-349-24002-9_4

Mussh, M. and Roses, S. 1978. Monopoly and Produce Quality. [Accessed 25 February 2024]. Available from: https://neconomides.stern.nyu.edu/networks/phdcourse/Mussa_Rosen_Monopoly_and_Product_Quality.pdf.

Vernon, L., S. 1962. An Experimental Study of Competitive Market Behavior. Journal of political economy, 70(2), pp.111-137.

McDermott, W. 1978. Medicine: The Public Good and One's Own. Johns Hopkins University Press

Downloads

Published

05-03-2024

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Wu, J. (2024). Is It Radical or Feasible for Drugs to Become A Global Public Good?. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 13(3), 243-246. https://doi.org/10.54097/xqaes386