A Fuzzy Evaluation Approach for Scientific Research Projects with 2-Tuple Linguistic Preference Relations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/fbem.v2i3.188Keywords:
Science and technology project evaluation; Linguistic preference relation; 2-tuple linguisticAbstract
Science and technology project evaluation is an important means of science and technology management. Whether the evaluation of science and technology projects is fair or not directly affects the development of national economy and the allocation of science and technology resources. Due to the complexity of the project and the fuzziness of human thinking, the expert information is often difficult to quantify in the process of project evaluation. Generally, the better choice is to express it in qualitative language. In this paper, the 2-tuple linguistic preference relation is proposed to evaluate scientific research projects. The reasonableness of the concept of complete consistency for the 2-tuple linguistic preference relation is discussed. Priority of 2-tuple linguistic preference relation is set up based on the 2-tuple weighted geometric averaging operator. Finally, combined with Science and technology project evaluation problem, the effectiveness and feasibility of the method are verified.
Downloads
References
Jin M . Foreign Present Condition of the science and technology project evaluation and development trend research. International Journal of Business and Management, 2009, 3(8): 124-129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v3n8p123
Wang X, Wu Q. Evaluation of scientific research fund projects based on fuzzy language. Scientific and technological progress and countermeasures, 2007, 24(9): 61-63.
Dey P K . Integrated project evaluation and selection using multiple-attribute decision-making technique. International Journal of Production Economics, 2006, 103(1):90-103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.11.018
Zhu J J, Wang H H, Ye C, et al. Project evaluation method using non-formatted text information based on multi-granular linguistic labels[J]. Information Fusion, 2015, 24:93-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2014.09.006
Faizi S, Nawaz S, Ur-Rehman A. Intuitionistic 2-tuple linguistic aggregation information based on Einstein operations and their applications in group decision making. Artificial Intelligence Review, 2020, 53(1): 4625-4650. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-020-09856-z
Faizi S, Saabun W, Nawaz S, et al. Best-Worst method and Hamacher aggregation operations for intuitionistic 2-tuple linguistic sets. Expert Systems with Applications, 2021:115088. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115088
Rodríguez RM, Martínez L, Herrera F. Hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets for decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst, 2012,20(1):109–119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2011.2170076
Herrera F, Herrera Viedma E, Martínez L. A fusion approach for managing multi-granularity linguistic term sets in decision making. Fuzzy sets and systems, 2000, 114( 1) : 43-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(98)00093-1
Dong YC, Hong WC, Xu YF, Yu S. Selecting the individual numerical scale and prioritization method in the analytic hierarchy process: A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic approach. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst, 2011, 19:13–26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TFUZZ.2010.2073713
Dong Y, Xu Y, Li H . On consistency measures of linguistic preference relations. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008, 189(2):430-444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.06.013
Xu Y, Huang L. An Approach to Group Decision Making Problems Based on 2-Tuple Linguistic Aggregation Operators. International Colloquium on Computing, Communication, Control, & Management. IEEE, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CCCM.2008.40
