Research on the Impact Mechanism of Green Technology Innovation on ESG performance

Regulatory effects based on environmental regulation

Authors

  • Wenyu Li

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/rwt3be43

Keywords:

Green technology innovation, Enterprise ESG performance, Environmental regulation, Green process innovation, Green product innovation

Abstract

In the context of " Carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals", the ESG concept of integrated environment, society and governance is an important standard for evaluating enterprises in promoting green and sustainable development of economy and fulfilling social responsibility. How to improve enterprise ESG performance is very important, and green technology innovation is one of the key ways to achieve enterprise ESG goals. Based on the panel data of A-share listed companies from 2009 to 2022, this paper uses the fixed-effect model for empirical testing. The research shows that green technology innovation has a significant role in promoting the ESG performance of enterprises; Environmental regulation plays a negative regulating role. The green technology innovation is divided into green product innovation and green process innovation, and it is found that green process innovation contributes to the improvement of green product innovation, so as to promote the ESG performance of enterprises. The impact of green technology innovation on ESG performance of enterprises is heterogeneous. For state-owned enterprises, enterprises in central and western regions and heavily polluting enterprises, improving green technology innovation can have a more positive impact on ESG performance of enterprises. In addition, after a series of endogeneity and robustness tests, the above conclusions are still valid. Businesses and governments should work together to promote green technology innovation to enhance ESG performance and promote green and sustainable economic and social development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ABOUD A, DIAB A. The Impact of Social, Environmental and Corporate Governance Disclosures on Firm Val.ue [J]. Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 2018, 8(4):442-458.

Barmey, J. B. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage ll. Journal of Management, 1991, 17, (1) :99-120.

Bi Da Tian, Huang Weixin, Wang Lu et al. How does the development of urban digital economy affect enterprise ESG performance? -- A common approach of urban enterprises for green and high-quality development [J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2019, 42(03):594-604.

BRAUN E, WIELD D, 1994. Regulation as a means for the social control of technologyly. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 6(3):259-272

CAI W, ZHOU X, 2014. On the drivers of eco-innovation: Empirical evidence from China [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 79: 239-248.

Cui Guanghui, Jiang Yingbing. The impact of environmental regulation on corporate environmental governance behavior: a quasi-natural experiment based on the new Environmental Protection Law [J]. Economic Management, 2019, 41(10):54-72.

Dangelico R M, Pontrandolfo P. Being ’Green and Competitive’: The impact of environmental actions and collaborations on firmperformancell. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2013, 24(6):413-430.

Duque-Grisales E, Aguilera-Caracuel J. 2021. Environmental, social and governance (ESG) scores and financial performanceof multilatinas: Moderating effects of geographic international diversification and financial slack (1. Journal of BusinessEthics, 168:315-334.

Hu Jie, Han Yiming, Zhong Yong. How enterprise digital transformation affects Enterprise ESG performance: Evidence from Chinese listed companies [J]. Industrial Economics Review, 2023(01):105-123.

HUANG J W, LI Y H, 2017. Green innovation and performance: The view of organizational capability and social reciprocity [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 145(2): 309-324.

Huang Shizhong. Three theoretical pillars supporting ESG [J]. Finance and Accounting Monthly, 2021, (19):3-10.

Jia Chunxiang, Zhang Yan. The impact of green technology innovation on firm performance based on PVAR model [J]. Ecological Economy, 2023, 39(03):63-69. (in Chinese)

Jin Xin, Guo Rui, Chen Bowei et al. How can green process innovation improve Business Performance? The moderating effect of multiple mediations and organizational redundancy based on intellectual capital [J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 202, 42(06):221-228.

Li Jinglin, Yang Zhen, Chen Jin et al. Research on the mechanism of ESG promoting firm performance: from the perspective of firm innovation [J]. Science of Science and Science and Technology Management, 2019, 42(09):71-89.

Li Jinglin, Yang Zhen, Chen Jin. How does ESG performance empower companies to innovate in green technology? -- Micro evidence from Chinese listed companies [J/OL]. Journal of Management Engineering, 1-17[2024-03-09].

LID Y, ZHENG M, CAO C C, et al. The impact oflegitimacy pressure and corporate profitability ongreen innovation: Evidence from China top 100. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017(141):41-49.

LIU Bai, Lu Jiarui, Ju Tao. Formalism or materialism: A study on green innovation under the soft regulation of ESG rating [J]. Nankai Management Review, 2019,26(05):16-28.

Liu Rongzeng, He Chun. Study on threshold effect of environmental regulation on income inequality of urban residents [J]. China Soft Science,2021(08):41-52.

Ma Zhisheng, Liu Peng, CAI Linghui. Management system certification and Enterprise ESG performance [J]. Finance and Accounting Monthly,2024,45(02):23-30.

OECD, 2010. OECD factbook: Economic, environmental and social statistics [M]. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Pan Ailing, Liu Xin, Qiu Jinlong et al. Whether green mergers and acquisitions under media pressure can promote substantial transformation of heavy polluting enterprises [J]. China Industrial Economics, 2019, No.371(02):174-192.

POPP D, 2002. Induced innovation and energy prices [J]. American Economic Review, 92(1): 160-180.

Ren Yuejun, Zhang Kaihua. Research on the correlation between public pressure, corporate governance and environmental cost [J]. Research on Financial and Economic Issues, 2016, (10):93-100.

Ruhaya A, Alam M M, Jamaliah S, et al. 2018. The impacts of environmental, social. And governance factors on firm per-formance1. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal. 29(2):182-194

Shen Xiaobo, Chen Yu, Lin Boqiang. The impact of technological progress and industrial structure distortion on energy intensity in China [J]. Economic Research Journal, 2019, 56(02):157-173.

Su Dongwei, Lian Lili. Does green credit affect the investment and financing behavior of heavy polluting enterprises? [J]. Journal of Financial Research, 2018, (12):123-137.

Su Yuan, Li Guangpei. Green technology innovation ability, product differentiation and enterprise competitiveness: Based on analysis of listed companies in energy conservation and environmental protection industry [J]. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 29(04):46-56.

Sun Dong, Yang Shuo, Zhao Yuxuan, et al. A study on the correlation between ESG performance, financial status and systemic risk: A case study of Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share electric power listed companies [J]. China Environmental Management, 2019, 11(02):37-43.

Sun Weizheng. Environmental, Social and governance (ESG) performance relationship and its impact on firm performance [J]. Contemporary Manager, 2020, (03):16-19.

Wang F Z, Chen F F, 2018. Board governance, environmental regulation and green technology innovation: An empirical study of Listed companies in heavily polluting industries in China [J]. Research in Science of Sciences, 36 (2): 361-369.

Wang Haijun, Wang Songzheng, Zhang Chen, et al. Does digital transformation improve ESG performance? -- Empirical research based on MSCI index [J]. Foreign Economics and Management, 2023, 45(06):19-35.

Wang Linlin, Lian Yonghui, Dong Jie. Research on the influence mechanism of ESG performance on firm value [J]. Securities Market Review, 2022, (05):23-34.

WANG Mingyue, Li Yingming, Wang Zitong. Enterprise green technology innovation and performance under the double uncertainty of technology and market [J]. Journal of Systems Management, 201, 30(02):353-362. (in Chinese)

WANG Mingyue, Li Yingming, Wang Zitong. U-shaped relationship between environmental performance and economic performance of enterprises' green technology innovation and regulation of competition [J]. Scientific Management Research, 21, 39(05):107-116.

Wang Pei, Yang Shucheng, Huang Shan. Study on the impact of environmental protection tax on corporate environmental, social and governance performance: Based on the intermediary effect of green technology innovation [J]. Tax Research, 2021(11):50-56.

Wang Yinghuan, Guo Yongzhen. Enterprise digital transformation and ESG performance: Based on empirical evidence of listed enterprises in China [J]. Journal of Finance and Economics, 2019, 49(09):94-108.

Wang Yipan, He Yuan. Environmental regulation, relocation of heavy polluting enterprises and collaborative governance effect: Based on empirical evidence of establishing subsidiaries in different places [J]. Chinese Journal of Economic Sciences, 2021, No.245(05):130-145.

Wen Zhonglin, Ye Baojuan. Mediation effect analysis: Development of methods and models [J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(05):731-745.

Xie Hongjun, Lv Xue. Responsible International Investment: ESG and China's OFDI [J]. Economic Research Journal, 202, 57(3):83-99.

XIE X M, HUO J G, ZOU H L. Green processinnovation, green product innovation, and corporatefinancial performance: A content analysis method]Journal of Business Research, 2019, 101:697-706.

Xie Xuemei, Zhu Qiwei. How to solve the problem of "harmonious coexistence" in the practice of enterprise green innovation? [J]. Management World, 2019, 37(01):128-149+9.

Xu Jia, Cui Jingbo. Low-carbon city and enterprise green technology innovation [J]. China Industrial Economy, 2020, (12):178-196.

Yang Yongjie, Ruan Xinyan. Digital transformation, green technology innovation and firm ESG performance: the regulatory role of environmental regulation [J]. Journal of Harbin University of Commerce (Social Science Edition), 2023(05):34-47.

Yu Fei, Liu Mingxia, Wang Lingfeng, et al. 2019. The influence mechanism of knowledge coupling on green innovation of manufacturing enterprises: the regulatory role of redundant resources. Nankai Management Review, 22 (3): 54-65, 76.

Yuan Yehu, Xiong Xiaohan. Research on the relationship between ESG performance and corporate performance of Listed companies: Moderating effect based on media attention [J]. Social Sciences of Jiangxi, 21, 41(10):68-77.

Zheng Yuanzhen, Wang Zhuohan, CAI Yi, et al. Study on the impact of green technology innovation on ESG performance and its path under the new dual-carbon structure [J]. Journal of Technology and Economics, 2019, 42(03):64-77.

Downloads

Published

11-07-2024

Issue

Section

Articles