Study on the motivation of enterprise greenwashing behavior based on the perspective of environmental commitment implementation
A case study of Hegang
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/zr3zkz59Keywords:
Greenwashing behavior, Information disclosure, Environmental commitmentAbstract
With the rapid economic growth, the issue of ecological environmental protection has been widely concerned by the public, and has triggered diversified discussions. As the main participants in social and economic activities, enterprises play a pivotal role in this issue, not only bearing social responsibility, but also playing a decisive role in environmental protection practices. In the context of consciously undertaking social responsibilities and responding to institutional requirements, enterprises often express their firm position and commitment to environmental protection and compliance with laws and regulations through information disclosure. In practice, some enterprises run counter to their environmental protection commitments, choosing to "low investment, high return" as the goal of greenwashing behavior. Taking Hegang as the research object, this paper summarizes the process of implementing environmental commitment as the result of the joint action of two factors: implementation ability and implementation motivation. Then, the paper analyzes the major environmental pollution cases of Hesteel, analyzes the motivation of Hesteel's greenwashing behavior from the perspective of the implementation ability and implementation motivation of environmental commitment, and finally puts forward corresponding suggestions for the shortcomings of the enterprise itself and external regulatory departments in preventing greenwashing behavior, in order to optimize the governance mechanism and improve regulatory efficiency.
Downloads
References
Chen Xiaoyan, Xiao Hua, ZHANG Guoqing. Does environmental Punishment promote corporate environmental governance? Analysis based on dual dimensions of process and result [J]. Economic Management, 2019, 43(06):136-155.
Huang Shizhong. "Greenwashing" and "anti-greenwashing" in ESG report [J]. Financial Monthly, 2022(01):3-11.
Zhang Kexin, Pan An 'e. Market reaction of listed companies' greenwashing behavior: Based on the perspective of environmental information disclosure [J]. Finance and Accounting Bulletin, 2018(29):57-60.
Gao and Pratima Bansal.Instrumental and Integrative Logicsn in Business Sustainability [J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2013, 112(2): 241-255.
Yu Linxiu. Does institutional pressure inhibit the "greenwashing" of corporate environmental information? Based on the evidence of A-share market [J]. Journal of Finance and Accounting, 2019(22):105-114.
Chaminda Wijethilake and Tek Lama.Sustainability core values and sustainability risk management: Moderating effects of top management commitment and stakeholder pressure [J]. Business Strategy and the Environment, 2019, 28(1):143-154.
Huang Rongbing, Zhao Qian. Research on enterprise greenwashing from the perspective of evolution: a case study based on China's Greenwashing List [J]. Accounting Research, 2018(04):11-19.
CAI Ling, Chen Lingfang. Research on the negative effects of Corporate Social Responsibility "greenwashing" and governance countermeasures [J]. Financial Management Research, 2021(11):65-69.
Xiao Hongjun, Shang Huichen. Digital Corporate Social Responsibility: Current situation, problems and Countermeasures [J]. Industrial Economics Review, 2022(06):133-152.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







