Research on the Impact of Disclosure of Key Audit Matters on Corporate Financing Constraints

Authors

  • Yihan Fang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/3wje9w84

Keywords:

Key audit matters, Corporate financing constraints, Corporate governance, Board size

Abstract

This paper studies the impact of key audit disclosures on corporate financing constraints through empirical analysis. Although the disclosure of key audit matters can help to reduce the information differences between management and investors and improve the audit quality, such disclosure may also be regarded as a risk signal, and the warning function to investors may cause the difficulty of corporate financing to increase. This study concludes that the increase in the number of key audit disclosures will make corporate financing more difficult. When an enterprise announces more key audit matters, the market may regard them as a stronger risk signal, causing investors to be more cautious in making investment decisions, thus increasing the financing difficulty of the enterprise. However, in companies with large board sizes, the disclosure of key audit matters can alleviate the financing constraints. Larger boards are more likely to make the right decisions and therefore may disclose fewer risky aspects of key audit matters. This study provides a new understanding of key audit issues in financing activities and a useful reference for the possible impact of macro-policy adjustments on corporate profitability. In addition, the research also provides useful information support for enterprises to understand and adapt to the new auditing standards.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Christensen, Brant E, Elder, et al. Behind the Numbers: Insights into Large Audit Firm Sampling Policies [J]. Accounting Horizons, 2015.DOI:10.2308/acch-50921. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-50921

[2] Li, L., Huang, L., & Li, Y. (2009). Corporate group operation and financing constraints: An analysis from static and dynamic perspectives. China Soft Science, 4, 9.

[3] Liu, D. (2018). Enterprise strategic differences and debt financing costs (Doctoral dissertation, Shihezi University). Retrieved from https://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CDFD&dbname=CDFD2018&filename=1018884377.nh

[4] Myers, S. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13(2), 187–221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(84)90023-0

[5] Reid, L. C. , & Carcello, J. V. . (2014). Investor reaction to the prospect of mandatory audit firm rotation. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 92(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2384152

[6] Sirois, L. P., Bédard, J., & Bera, P. (2018). The informational value of key audit matters in the auditor’s report: Evidence from an eye-tracking study. Accounting Horizons, 32(2), 141–162. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-51847 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2308/acch-52047

Downloads

Published

30-09-2024

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Fang, Y. (2024). Research on the Impact of Disclosure of Key Audit Matters on Corporate Financing Constraints. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 16(3), 137-140. https://doi.org/10.54097/3wje9w84