Risk Changes and Prevention in the Innovative Development of Supply Chain Finance

Authors

  • Dong Dong

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/00s9bw14

Keywords:

Supply Chain Finance Innovation, Risk Changes, Prevention Measures

Abstract

With the increasing segmentation of social production, the nature of market competition has evolved, shifting from competition among individual customers within a supply chain to competition between entire supply chains. In recent years, supply chain finance has been widely applied in various sectors, effectively addressing the financing difficulties faced by small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the supply chain. In this environment, the development of supply chain finance has received significant attention. To encourage its development, government agencies can leverage their macro-guidance capabilities, introduce relevant measures based on the actual situation, and require banking and insurance institutions to rely on core supply chain enterprises. By treating the transactions of core enterprises and their upstream and downstream partners as the foundation, financial institutions can integrate various types of information and provide comprehensive financial services to all participants in the supply chain. However, during the process of innovation and development in supply chain finance, various risks inevitably arise. These risks must be managed and mitigated through different risk management strategies to enable supply chain finance to better serve the real economy and promote its sustainable development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Chod J., Trichakis N., Tsoukalas G., Aspegren H., and Weber M. (2020) On the Financing Benefits of Supply Chain Transparency and Blockchain Adoption. Management Science, 6610, 4378–4396.

[2] Cao S., Feng F., Chen W., and Zhou C. (2020) Does market competition promote innovation efficiency in China’s high-tech industries? Technology Analysis Strategic Management, 324, 429–442.

[3] Zhao T., and Fang H. (2019) An Empirical Study on OFDI and Innovation Efficiency in China. The Journal of Quantitative Technical Economics, 10, 58–76 (in Chinese).

[4] Su Y., and Zhong B. (2017) Supply chain finance decision analysis with a partial credit guarantee contract. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 56, 1355–1369

[5] Gibson C., and Vermeulen F. (2003) A healthy divide: Subgroups as a stimulus for team learning behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly, 482, 202–239.

[6] Tomlinson P.R. (2011) Strong ties, substantive embeddedness and innovation: exploring differences in the innovative performance of small and medium-sized firms in uk manufacturing. Knowledge Process Management, 18(2), 95–108.

[7] Turner N., Swart J., and Maylor H. (2013) Mechanisms for Managing Ambidexterity: A Review and Research Agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 153, 317–332.

[8] Moretto A., Grassi L., Caniato F., Giorgino M., and Ronchi S. (2019) Supply chain finance: From traditional to supply chain credit rating. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 252, 197–217.

[9] Zhao L., Huo B., Sun L., and Zhao X. (2013) The impact of supply chain risk on supply chain integration and company performance: a global investigation. Supply Chain Management-an International Journal, 182, 115–131.

[10] Wetzel P., and Hofmann E. (2019) Supply chain finance, financial constraints and corporate performance: An explorative network analysis and future research agenda. International Journal of Production Economics, 216, 364–383.

Downloads

Published

30-11-2024

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Dong, D. (2024). Risk Changes and Prevention in the Innovative Development of Supply Chain Finance. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 17(2), 46-49. https://doi.org/10.54097/00s9bw14