A Study on the Framework for Spatial Performance Evaluation of Small Township Mergered

Authors

  • Yi Wang
  • Yuqiong Li
  • Yanli Tang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/wk6egh79

Keywords:

Small Township Mergered, Spatial Performance, Evaluation Framework

Abstract

A spatial performance evaluation system was built to identify the effectiveness and problems of the small township mergered systematically and accurately. Based on the evaluation criteria of efficiency, equity and bottom line, KPI method is used to establish a four-level (goal - field - element - index) spatial performance evaluation framework for withdrawal and merger at regional and individual scales respectively. Two sets of index systems for regional small town groups and small town individuals respectively which are interconnected are established in the four fields of “system-policy”, “space-land”, “society-economy”, and “security-guarantee”. It provides a new idea and a practical technical model for the ex ante forecast, ex post evaluation and adjustment feedback about the formulation and implementation of small towns related policies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Y.P. Wei and M. Zhao, “Spatial Structure and Performance of Metropolis: Interpetation and AP-Plication of Polycentric Structure,” in City Planning Review. pp.9-16, Apr. 2006.

[2] B. Lv and N. Cao, “Environmental Performance Evaluation of Chinese Urban Form,” inUrban Development Studies. vol. 18, pp. 38-46, Jul. 2011.

[3] B.D. Sun, X.H. Wang and Y.Y. Cai, “An Empirical Study on the Economic Performance of Polycentric Spatial Structure of Mega-Cities in China,” in City Planning Review. vol.39, pp.39-45, Aug. 2015.

[4] H.T. Wang, X. Chen and C. Lei, “Spatial Performance Evaluation and Evolution Mechanism of Metropolis Peripheral Area, Suzhou,” in Planners. vol.35, pp.5-11, Sep. 2019.

[5] F.Q. Li, M. Zhao and J. Z. Huang, “The Performance of Spatial Structure and the Choice of Development Model of Mage-City,” in Urban Planning Forum. pp.18-27, Jan. 2021.

[6] X.J. Ren, X.J. Chen and Q. Ma, “A Study on the Optimazation of Urban Land Layout Under the Guidance of Spatial Economic Performance,” in City Planning Review. vol.43, pp.50-59, Jul. 2019.

[7] Y. Bai, Z. Chen andR. Yan, “Evaluation of City Spatial Performance Balance Degree Model Base on the Traditional ‘Triangle Model’: A Case Study in ‘Jin City’ of Tianjin,” in Proc. 2022 Urban Planning Annu. China, Sep. 2023.

[8] Y. Cheng and Q.X. Wang, “Research on performance evaluation of spatial development under the system of spatial planning: Framework construction and several reflections,” in Journal of Natural Resources. vol.39, pp.274-286, Feb. 2024.

Downloads

Published

30-11-2024

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Wang, Y., Li, Y., & Tang, Y. (2024). A Study on the Framework for Spatial Performance Evaluation of Small Township Mergered. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 17(2), 137-141. https://doi.org/10.54097/wk6egh79