Research on Sampling Inspection Method for Supply Chain Components Based on Binomial Distribution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/fj7cmw77Keywords:
Global Manufacturing, Quality Control, Supply Chain Decision Making, Binomial Distribution, Hypothesis TestingAbstract
In the context of accelerated growth in global manufacturing, conventional full inspection faces challenges meeting enterprise demands for effective supplier component quality control, while statistical sampling based on binomial distribution ensures reliability and reduces costs by rationally setting confidence levels and error ranges. This study proposes an autonomous method for determining the minimum sample size based on binomial distribution and hypothesis testing to ascertain the acceptance or rejection of spare parts contingent on the defective rate. Specifically, spare parts should be rejected if the defective rate exceeds the nominal value at 95% confidence, and accepted if it does not exceed this value at 90% confidence. This paper derives the formula for calculating the minimum sample size using test theory based on normal distribution approximation. The findings indicate that when the defective rate constitutes 10% of the nominal value, the minimum sample size necessary to receive the spare parts with 95% confidence is 139, and the minimum sample size required to receive the spare parts with 90% confidence is 98. This significant efficiency enhancement over comprehensive inspections is complemented by sensitivity analysis of the defective rate, confidence level, and random error, supporting rational production decisions under resource constraints.
Downloads
References
[1] Jahani Mw, Raji F, Zojaji Z .Securing supply chain through blockchain-integrated algorithmic system: ensuring product quality and counterfeiting tags detection [J]. Cluster Computing, 2024, 28(1):51-51.
[2] Rai U, Oluleye G, Hawkes A .Stochastic optimisation model to determine the optimal contractual capacity of a distributed energy resource offered in a balancing services contract to maximise profit [J]. Energy Reports, 2024, 115800-5818.
[3] Russell D M, Galloway B J .Driving down the cost of biologics: lessons from a nationalised health-care system [J]. Lancet (London, England), 2024, 404(10464):1723-1724.
[4] Du L, Zhang Y, Lu K .Pricing and Financing Strategies in a Dual-Channel Low-Carbon Supply Chain for Bilateral Capital-Constrained Retailers [J]. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 2024, 17(1):272-272.
[5] Barman A, Chakraborty K A, Sana S S, et al. Pricing Strategy and Risk-Averse Flexibility in Sustainable Supply Chain: A Dual-Channel Logistics Process Under Reward Contracts and Demand Uncertainty [J]. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 2024, 25(4):733-762..
[6] Rajabzadeh H, Rabiee M, Sarkis J .Sourcing from risky reverse channels: Insights on pricing and resilience strategies in sustainable supply chains [J]. International Journal of Production Economics, 2024, 276109373-109373.
[7] K. A G, K. J J. Pricing strategy with quality improvement in a dual collection channel closed-loop supply chain under return uncertainty [J]. Operational Research, 2024, 24(2).
[8] SHI Biao, LI Yu Xia, YU Xhua, YAN Wang. Short-term load forecasting based on modified particle swarm optimizer and fuzzy neural network model [J]. Systems Engineering-Theory and Practice, 2010, 30(1): 158-160.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







