Impact of Deposit Insurance System on Moral Hazard of Commercial Banks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/hxx8ss92Keywords:
Deposit Insurance System, Moral Hazard, High-Risk Investment.Abstract
With the advancement of financial globalization, China, as a country with a trade surplus, exports products to various countries around the world while also absorbing different currencies. In this context, the issue of how to maintain economic security while holding a large amount of foreign currency has become a topic worth considering. To ensure the safety of currency deposits, the government must have sufficient means and the capability to secure the currency. In the long term, the establishment of deposit insurance in China and its impact on the risks associated with commercial banks' moral hazards is of greater concern. Since its inception in the United States, the deposit insurance system has faced considerable criticism. Although its original intention was to stabilize the domestic economy, this system can lead to moral hazard problems in banks, causing excessive lending and an increase in non-performing assets, which in turn undermines the overall stability of the domestic economy and obstructs its steady development. Research on the system has shown that deposit insurance does indeed affect the moral hazard issues in commercial banks. Interestingly, bank size plays a significant role: the larger the bank, the greater the excess, the higher the risk-weighted asset ratio, and the larger the capital buffer. In other words, smaller banks are more likely to face moral hazard issues under the loan insurance system than larger banks.
Downloads
References
[1] Diamond & Dybivg , Another Attempt to Explain an Illiquid Banking System: the Diamond and Dybivg Model with Sequential Service Taken Seriously.Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review,1983(12).
[2] Chen, Banking Panies: The Role of the First-eome, First-served Rule and Information Externalities. Journal of Political Economy,1999(5).
[3] Jean‐CharlesRochet , COORDINATION FAILURES AND THE LENDER OF LAST RESORT: WAS BAGEHOT RIGHT AFTER ALL.Journal of the European Economic Association, 2010(6).
[4] James Peck. Equilibrium Bank Runs [J]. Journal of Political Economy,2003(1).
[5] Donald P. Morgan. Using Loan Rates to Measure and Regulate Bank Risk: Findings and an Immodest Proposal [J]. Journal of Financial Services Research,2003(2).
[6] Tang, Hongbo. Deposit insurance system and bank corporate governance[J]. Financial Research, 2008, No.337(07):154-159.
[7] Wang Daoping. Interest rate marketization, deposit insurance system and systemic banking crisis prevention[J]. Financial Research, 2016, No.427(01):50-65.
[8] Tian Guoqiang, Zhao Yupu, Gong Rukai. Interest rate marketization, deposit insurance system and bank runs[J]. Economic Research, 2016, 51(03): 96-109.
[9] Guo Ye, Zhao Jing. Deposit Insurance System, Bank Heterogeneity and Individual Bank Risk [J]. Economic Research, 2017, 52(12):134-148.
[10] Xiang Houjun, Zhang Qingjun. China's explicit deposit insurance system and bank risk[J]. Economic Research, 2020, 55(12): 165-181.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







