Research on the Impact of Digital Trade Development on The Resilience of Manufacturing Global Value Chain

Authors

  • Xing Ming

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/b62d3h47

Keywords:

Digital trade, Manufacturing, Global value chain resilience

Abstract

As the core element of modern digital economy, digital trade plays an important role in the toughness of the global value chain of manufacturing industry and the high-quality development of manufacturing industry. This paper makes an empirical study on the impact of digital trade on the resilience of manufacturing global value chain. Firstly, according to the theoretical connotation of Digital Trade and global value chain resilience, the development level of digital trade is measured from four dimensions: digital innovation, digital trade capacity, infrastructure environment and trade potential; From the two aspects of security and stability, this paper constructs the manufacturing global value chain toughness index, calculates and analyzes the manufacturing global value chain toughness of various countries. Secondly, we use a variety of econometric methods to empirically test the impact of digital trade on the length of the global value chain and its mechanism, to investigate how digital trade affects the division of labor in the global value chain, and further explore the impact on the toughness of the global value chain. Finally, according to the research conclusion, from the perspective of digital trade, this paper puts forward policy suggestions to promote the resilience of the manufacturing global value chain.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Chen Xiaohong, Li Yangyang, Song Lijie, Wang Yangjie. Theoretical system and research prospect of digital economy [j]. management world, 2022, (2):208-224+13-16.

[2] Fan Xin. Digital economy development, international trade efficiency and trade uncertainty [j]. finance and trade economy, 2020, (8):145-160.

[3] Jia Huaiqin, Gao Xiaoyu, Xu Xiaojuan, Fang Yuanxin. The conceptual framework, index system and measurement method of Digital Trade Measurement [j]. statistical research, 2021, 38 (12): 30-41.

[4] Li Tianjian, Zhao Xuejun. Exploration on ensuring the safety of industrial chain supply chain in New China [j]. management world, 2022, (9):31-41.

[5] Liu Huizheng, Zhu Guang. The impact of global value chain embeddedness on the export technological complexity of China's equipment manufacturing industry -- a study based on the heterogeneity of imported intermediate goods [j]. international trade issues, 2019, (8): 80~94.

[6] Ma Shuzhong, Fang Chao, Liang Yinfeng. Digital Trade and its era value and research prospects [j]. international trade issues, 2018 (10): 16-30.

[7] Xu Xianchun, Zhang Meihui. Research on the scale measurement of China's Digital Economy -- Based on the perspective of international comparison [j]. China's industrial economy, 2020, (5):23-41.

[8] Zhang Qing, Yu Jinping. Digitalization of manufacturing investment and the rise of high-end in the global value chain -- a re test based on the difference of investment sources [j]. financial research, 2021, (9):93-107.

[9] Andrea C, Antonello Z. The virtues and limits of specialization in global value chains: analysis and policy implications [J]. Journal of Industrial and Business Economics, 2023, 50(1): 73-90.

[10] Buckley P J, Craig T D, Mudambi R. Time to learn? Assignment duration in global value chain organization [J]. Journal of Business Research, 2019, 103: 508-518.

[11] Luis W A. Distributive Profiles Associated with Domestic versus International Specialization in Global Value Chains [J]. International Journal of Political Economy, 2023, 52(2): 117-152.

[12] Melitz M J., 2003, The Impact of Trade on Intra-Industry Reallocation and Aggregate Industrial Productivity [J] Econometrica, 71(6), 1695-1725.

Downloads

Published

21-03-2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ming, X. (2025). Research on the Impact of Digital Trade Development on The Resilience of Manufacturing Global Value Chain. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 18(3), 256-259. https://doi.org/10.54097/b62d3h47