The Internal Fit and Practical Enlightenment of the Philosophical Thought of the Tao Te Ching and the Theory of Self-Leadership
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/27yq3y22Keywords:
Tao Te Ching, Self-leadership, Taoism is natural, Inaction, Cross-cultural managementAbstract
As the core theory of individual self-regulation in organizational behavior, self-leadership emphasizes the achievement of goals through internal regulation, and its effectiveness has been empirically supported in multiple scenarios such as remote work and crisis response. However, most of the existing research is rooted in the perspective of Western individualist culture, and there is insufficient attention to the adaptability and localization practice in the context of Eastern collectivism. As a classic classic of traditional Chinese philosophy, the Tao Te Ching contains rich self-regulation wisdom such as "Taoism follows nature", "rule by doing nothing", and "self-knowledge is clear", which deeply resonates with the core logic of self-leadership "self-management through internal drive". Through theoretical deconstruction and literature cross-reference, this study systematically analyzes the internal compatibility between the two: "rule by doing nothing" and the natural reward strategy share the logical core of "conforming to intrinsic motivation", while "self-knowing is clear" and constructive thinking strategies are based on self-cognition, and "trying to figure out is easier than easy" is highly consistent with the behavioral focus strategy at the level of goal dismantling. Combined with empirical research in the field of self-leadership (e.g., Abid et al., 2021; Bakker et al., 2021), this study further proposes an integrated practice path at the individual and organizational levels, providing theoretical support and practical enlightenment for organizations to improve employees' self-management ability and cope with uncertain challenges, and supplementing the cross-cultural development of self-leadership theory from an oriental philosophical perspective.
Downloads
References
[1] Abid, G., Arya, B., Arshad, A., Ahmed, S., & Farooqi, S. (2021). Positive personality traits and self-leadership in sustainable organizations: Mediating influence of thriving and moderating role of proactive personality. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 25(1), 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.09.005
[2] Alves, J. C., Lovelace, K. J., Manz, C. C., Matsypura, D., Toyasaki, F., & Ke, K. (2006). A cross-cultural perspective of self-leadership. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(4), 338–359. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610663123
[3] Amundsen, S., & Martinsen, Ø. L. (2015). Linking empowering leadership to job satisfaction, work effort, and creativity: The role of self-leadership and psychological empowerment. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 22(3), 304–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051814565819
[4] Bakker, A. B., breevaart, K., Scharp, Y. S., & de Vries, J. D. (2021). Daily self-leadership and playful work design: Proactive approaches of work in times of crisis. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/00218863211060453
[5] Cranmer, G. A., Goldman, Z. W., & Houghton, J. D. (2019). I’ll do it myself: Self-leadership, proactivity, and socialization. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 40(6), 684–698. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-11-2018-0389
[6] Hauschildt, K., & Konradt, U. (2012). The effect of self-leadership on work role performance in teams. Leadership, 8(2), 145–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715011429588
[7] Harari, M. B., Williams, E. A., Castro, S. L., & Brant, K. K. (2021). Self-leadership: A meta-analysis of over two decades of research. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 94(3), 581–608. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12365
[8] Ho, J., & Nesbit, P. L. (2014). Self-leadership in a Chinese context: Work outcomes and the moderating role of job autonomy. Group & Organization Management, 39(4), 389–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601114539389
[9] Houghton, J. D., & Neck, C. P. (2002). The revised self-leadership questionnaire: Testing a hierarchical factor structure for self-leadership. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 17(8), 672–691. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940210446245
[10] Houghton, J. D., Carnes, A., & Ellison, C. N. (2014). A cross-cultural examination of self-leadership: Testing for measurement invariance across four cultures. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 21(4), 414–430. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051813515753
[11] Jian, H., He, B., & Sun, X. (2024). The impact of developmental human resource practices on employee workplace procrastination: The moderating role of exploitative leadership and self-leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 45(8), 1548–1567. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-12-2023-0662
[12] Kang, H., Song, M., & Li, Y. (2022). Self-leadership and innovative behavior: Mediation of informal learning and moderation of social capital. Behav. Sci., 12(11), 443. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12110443
[13] Kalra, A., Agnihotri, R., Singh, R., Puri, S., & Kumar, N. (2021). Assessing the drivers and outcomes of behavioral self-leadership. European Journal of Marketing, 55(4), 1227–1257. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-11-2018-0769
[14] Knotts, K., Houghton, J. D., Pearce, C. L., Chen, H., Stewart, G. L., & Manz, C. C. (2022). Leading from the inside out: A meta-analysis of how, when, and why self-leadership affects individual outcomes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 31(2), 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2021.1953988
[15] Kotzé, M. (2018). The influence of psychological capital, self-leadership, and mindfulness on work engagement. South African Journal of Psychology, 48(2), 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081246317705812
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







