Research on the Eco-Bank Model Promoting the Realization of Wetland Ecological Product Value in Anhui Province

Authors

  • Hongjun Dai
  • Longfei Song

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/zednqs93

Keywords:

Realization of ecological product value, Eco-bank model, Wetlands, Anhui Province

Abstract

Wetlands are vital natural ecosystems. To promote their sustainable development, Anhui Province has adopted measures such as issuing carbon tickets and establishing cross-regional ecological compensation mechanisms in the process of realizing the value of wetland ecological products, achieving certain progress. However, challenges such as fragmentation, difficulties in value realization, and financing constraints persist. Drawing on successful domestic and international experiences with the eco-bank model, this study proposes integrating fragmented wetlands through a resource property rights transfer model, unlocking pathways for monetizing ecological services via an ecological rights trading model, addressing financing challenges through a green financial services model, and synergizing industry and ecology with a composite operation model. These approaches aim to accelerate the realization of wetland ecological product value, offering practical insights for advancing wetland ecological conservation and high-quality development in Anhui Province.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Tang Chao. Anhui Wetland Protection Plan Issued and Implemented [N]. Anhui Daily, 2023-11-20 (002).

[2] Robert L. Deal, Bobby Cochran, Gina La Rocco. Bundling of ecosystem services to increase forest land value and enhance sustainable forest management [J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 2012, (17):69-76.

[3] José R. Soto, Damian C. Adams, Francisco J. Escobedo. Landowner attitudes and willingness to accept compensation from forest carbon offsets: Application of best-worst choice modeling in Florida USA [J]. Forest Policy and Economics, 2016, 63(02):35-42.

[4] SCB. Protected forest land within nature reserves and national parks, in hectare by Nature type and year [J]. Protected areas, 2018, 3(05):23-24.

[5] SELVA G V, PAULI N, KIM M K, et al. Opportunity for change or reinforcing inequality: power, governance and equity implications of government payments for conservation in Brazil [J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2020, (105):102-112.

[6] Muradian R, Corbera E, Pascual U, et al. Reconciling theory and practice: An alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services [J]. Ecological economics, 2010, 69(6):1202-1208.

[7] Gao Xiaolong, Lin Yiqing, Xu Weihua, et al. Research Progress on the Realization of Ecological Product Value [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(1): 24-33.

[8] Wang Xiahui, Zhu Yuanyuan, Wen Yihui, et al. Basic Models and Innovative Pathways for Realizing the Value of Ecological Products [J]. Environmental Protection, 2020, 48(14): 14-17.

[9] Cui Li, Li Xinjian, Cheng Zhe. Research on the Realization Mechanism of Natural Resource Capitalization: A Case Study of Nanping 'Eco-Bank' [J]. Management World, 2019, 35(09): 95-100.

[10] Zhang Wenming. Improving the Value Realization Mechanism of Ecological Products: Based on Investigation of Fujian Forest Eco-Bank [J]. Macroeconomic Management, 2020, (03): 73-79.

[11] Zhou Jiangmei, Wang Ying, Lin Qing, et al. Market-Oriented Innovation in Modern Agricultural Scale Management Methods: A Case Study of Shaowu Eco-Bank in Fujian Province [J]. Taiwan Agricultural Research, 2020, (03): 20-28.

[12] Qiu Shaojun, Xu Shusheng, Wang Haocong. Insights from 'Eco-Bank' Practices for Realizing Ecological Product Value: A Case Study of Pilot Exploration in Nanping, Fujian [J]. China Land, 2021, (06): 43-45.

[13] Zhang Linbo, Cheng Liang, Xiang Wenjing, et al. The Development Process, Operation Models, and Improvement Suggestions for China's 'Forest Eco-Bank': A Case Study of Nanping City, Fujian Province [J]. Environmental Protection, 2023, 51(17): 21-26.

[14] Zhao Xue, Zhang Jianzhe, Cui Li. Research on Forest Resource Information Management Empowered by Eco-Bank Big Data Platform [J]. China Forest Products Industry, 2024, 61(01): 87-92.

[15] Zhang Linbo, Cheng Liang, Xiang Wenjing, et al. The Development Process, Operation Models, and Improvement Suggestions for China's 'Forest Eco-Bank': A Case Study of Nanping City, Fujian Province [J]. Environmental Protection, 2023, 51(17): 21-26.

[16] Zhou Ziji, Su Haiying, Liu Xiaoli. Domestic Practices and Insights of 'Eco-Bank' [J]. Forest Science and Technology, 2024, (02): 1-5.

[17] Xie Jianbin, He Yinghong. Research on the Model and Mechanism of Nanping Eco-Bank from the Perspective of 'Resource-Asset-Capital' Transformation [J]. Journal of Subtropical Resources and Environment, 2022, 17(02): 80-86.

[18] Zhang Yang. Research on the Construction of the 'Eco-Bank' System [D]. Yantai University, 2025.

[19] Xie Jianbin, He Yinghong. Research on the Model and Mechanism of Nanping Eco-Bank from the Perspective of 'Resource-Asset-Capital' Transformation [J]. Journal of Subtropical Resources and Environment, 2022, 17(02): 80-86.

[20] Zhou Ziji, Su Haiying, Liu Xiaoli. Domestic Practices and Insights of 'Eco-Bank' [J]. Forest Science and Technology, 2024, (02): 1-5.

[21] Fan Wenlin. Exploring Pathways for Realizing the Value of Ecological Products Based on the 'Eco-Bank' Concept [J]. Market Weekly, 2024, 37(23): 1-5.

[22] Zhang Yang. Research on the Construction of the 'Eco-Bank' System [D]. Yantai University, 2025.

[23] Qin Tao, Yu Hang, Ren Lijiu, et al. Comparison of 'Eco-Bank' Models, Development Challenges, and Innovation Strategies [J]. World Forestry Research, 2025, 38(02): 129-136.

[24] Zhao Xue, Zhang Jianzhe, Cui Li. Research on Forest Resource Information Management Empowered by Eco-Bank Big Data Platform [J]. China Forest Products Industry, 2024, 61(01): 87-92.

Downloads

Published

12-12-2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Dai, H., & Song, L. (2025). Research on the Eco-Bank Model Promoting the Realization of Wetland Ecological Product Value in Anhui Province. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 21(3), 40-46. https://doi.org/10.54097/zednqs93