Construction of Governance Community: Research on the Generative Mechanism of High-Quality Party Building Empowering Rural Social Resilience
A Narrative Analysis Based on the Qingyuan Party Building Model in Guangdong
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/jcsjhx03Keywords:
High-Quality Party Building, Rural Social Resilience, Governance Community, Narrative Analysis, Qingyuan ModelAbstract
Against the dual background of a risk society and rural transformation, how to enhance the resilience of rural society to withstand shocks, adapt to changes, and achieve transformation is a key issue in implementing the Rural Revitalization Strategy and the "High-quality Development Project for Hundreds of Counties, Thousands of Towns, and Myriads of Villages" (hereinafter referred to as the "100-1000-10000 Project"). Traditional bureaucratic governance often faces the dilemma of excessive rigidity and insufficient resilience when dealing with rural complexities. Based on social-ecological system theory, this paper introduces the perspective of "Governance Community" and employs narrative analysis to deeply dissect the practical logic of Qingyuan City, Guangdong Province, in leading rural revitalization with high-quality Party building. The study finds that high-quality Party building reconstructs the structural resilience, cultural resilience, and functional resilience of the countryside through three dimensions: "reshaping of organizational chains," "production of publicness," and "interest linkage mechanisms," respectively. The Qingyuan model demonstrates that the generative mechanism of Party building empowering rural social resilience lies in the Party organization transforming from a "suspended actor" of administrative power to a "core actor" of the governance community. By re-organizing dispersed atomized individuals, it realizes the leap from "unidirectional control" to "collaborative governance." This process not only resolves the crisis of rural involution but also provides a theoretically universal explanation and practical sample for good rural governance in the process of Chinese-style modernization.
Downloads
References
[1] Fang, Y. (2020). Towards Resilient Governance: Innovation in Community Governance from the Perspective of Risk Society. Academia, (03), 58-65.
[2] He, X. (2021). Rural Revitalization and the Endogenous Power of Grassroots Governance. Journal of Political Science, (05), 33-44.
[3] Wang, J., & Zhi, X. (2022). Party Building Leading the Development of New Rural Collective Economy: Theoretical Logic and Practical Path. Management World, 38(02), 112-126.
[4] Chen, J. (2021). Governance Community: Logic Transformation and Mechanism Construction of Party Building Leading Rural Governance. Chinese Public Administration, (09), 78-85.
[5] Li, X., & Yu, L. (2023). Urban-Rural Integration and Factor Mobility in Rural Revitalization. Sociological Studies, 38(01), 45-67.
[6] Jing, Y. (2020). Bringing Political Parties Back In: A New Horizon for Research on Rural Governance in China. Teaching and Research, (08), 12-20.
[7] Yu, J., & Ren, J. (2023). Construction of Social Governance Community in the Digital Age. Social Sciences in China, (04), 89-108.
[8] Wen, T. (2021). From Agriculture 1.0 to Agriculture 4.0: Rural Revitalization from the Perspective of Ecological Civilization. Issues in Agricultural Economy, (06), 4-15.
[9] Zhang, J. (2022). Grassroots Regime: Problems of Rural Institutions (Revised Edition). Shanghai: Shanghai People's Publishing House.
[10] Luo, X. (2024). On the Practical Logic of Party Building Leading Rural Revitalization — Based on a Survey in Guangdong Province. Journal of Public Management, 21(01), 156-166.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







