Under the Visage of the "Hundred-Town, Thousand-County, Ten-Thousand-Village Project": The Endogenous Dilemmas and Breakthrough Paths for Synergistic "Attraction, Cultivation, Retention, and Utilization" Talent Policy in the Northern Guangdong Urban Agglo

Authors

  • Yingmei Li
  • Jinpeng Zeng
  • Feng Zhong

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/r6k5st06

Keywords:

Hundred-Town, Thousand-County, Ten-Thousand-Village Project (HQT Project), Northern Guangdong (Yuebei) Urban Agglomeration, Talent Policy, ACRU, Synergistic Governance, Endogenous Dilemmas

Abstract

The "Hundred-Town, Thousand-County, Ten-Thousand-Village Project" (HQT Project) is a major strategic deployment for promoting regional coordinated development, with its core in overcoming the urban-rural dual structure. The talent element is the critical variable determining its success or failure. The Northern Guangdong (Yuebei) urban agglomeration, as a typical area of unbalanced development within Guangdong Province, has long faced the dual pressures of the Pearl River Delta's "siphoning effect" and its own insufficient "hematopoietic function." The synergistic failure of talent work—"unable to attract, cultivate, retain, or utilize" talent—is particularly prominent. Under the new visage of the HQT Project, this paper focuses on the "endogenous" dilemmas of the talent policies in the Yuebei urban agglomeration, rather than merely the "external" siphoning. Using qualitative research methods, including policy text coding and semi-structured in-depth interviews in a typical Yuebei city (City C), this study reveals four major endogenous dilemmas hindering the full-chain synergy of "attraction, cultivation, retention, and utilization" (ACRU): namely, the "structural mismatch" between policy goals and industrial demands; the "spatial imbalance" of policy resources between central urban areas and the county/town domains; the "path dependence" on "prioritizing attraction over cultivation" in policy tools; and the "institutional obstruction" of "fragmented implementation" (tiao-kuai). The study argues that breaking through these dilemmas requires moving beyond the "piecemeal" element subsidy model and shifting towards a systemic, ecological governance paradigm. To this end, this paper proposes four breakthrough paths: First, constructing a "precision" policy supply mechanism guided by industrial demand. Second, establishing a "differentiated" resource allocation system with the "county and town domains" as the focus. Third, promoting an "endogenous" cultivation shift from "incremental attraction" to "stock activation." Fourth, shaping a "synergistic" institutional guarantee aimed at "holistic governance." This research aims to provide theoretical insights and practical strategies for late-developing regions to overcome talent bottlenecks and achieve policy synergy under the HQT Project.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] He, J. Z., & Chu, X. (2022). Tizhi zhengti xing zhili shijiao xia difang zhengfu kua bumen xietong de shixian jizhi yanjiu—Yige G shi ‘yi wang tong guan’ gaige weili [A study on the realization mechanism of inter-departmental synergy in local government from the perspective of holistic governance: A case study of G City's 'One-Network Unified Management' reform]. E-Government, (11), 31-41.

[2] Sun, R., Ding, G., & Yao, Y. (2021). Rencai shengtai xitong xietong yanhua: Yige lilun kuangjia [Talent Ecosystem Synergistic Evolution: A Theoretical Framework]. Forum on Science and Technology in China, (10), 154-160.

[3] Wang, H. Y., & Miao, L. (2019). Zhongguo quyu rencai jingzheng: Tezheng, tiaozhan yu qushi [China's Regional Talent Competition: Characteristics, Challenges, and Trends]. Administrative Reform, (5), 26-32.

[4] Liu, X., & Li, Y. P. (2020). Weishenme “qiang” lai de rencai liu bu zhu?—Jiyu gongzuo qianru xing shijiao de fenxi [Why can't "snatched" talent be retained? —An analysis based on the perspective of work embeddedness]. Management World, 36(7), 143-157.

[5] Zhang, H. B., & Zhang, N. (2021). “Zhengti xing zhili” heyi youxiao? Yige wenxian pingshu [How is "Holistic Governance" effective? A literature review]. Public Administration Review, 14(3), 185-208.

[6] Yu, J. X., & Zheng, X. (2022). Zhengti xing zhili de Zhongguo tujing: Lilun, shijian yu weilai [The Chinese landscape of holistic governance: Theory, practice, and future]. Chinese Public Administration, (6), 6-16.

[7] Han, Z. M., & Fan, X. G. (2020). Jiaoyi chengben, yingshang huanjing yu gao zhiliang fazhan [Transaction Costs, Business Environment, and High-Quality Development]. Reform, (1), 69-79.

[8] General Office of the CPC Central Committee, & General Office of the State Council. (2021). Guanyu wanshan keji chengguo pingjia jizhi de zhidao yijian [Guiding Opinions on Improving the S&T Achievement Evaluation Mechanism].

[9] Mi, J. N., & Wang, C. X. (2023). Difang rencai zhengce xietong de “duandian” yu “dudian”—Jiyu G shi de tansuo xing anli yanjiu [The "breaking points" and "blocking points" of local talent policy synergy: An exploratory case study based on G City]. Public Management and Policy Review, (4), 118-132.

[10] Zeng, X. Q., & Jia, X. X. (2024). Xin zhi shengchan li fazhan de rencai zhicheng jizhi yanjiu [Research on the talent support mechanism for the development of new quality productive forces]. Economist, (3), 67-76.

Downloads

Published

24-12-2025

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Li, Y., Zeng, J., & Zhong, F. (2025). Under the Visage of the "Hundred-Town, Thousand-County, Ten-Thousand-Village Project": The Endogenous Dilemmas and Breakthrough Paths for Synergistic "Attraction, Cultivation, Retention, and Utilization" Talent Policy in the Northern Guangdong Urban Agglo. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 21(3), 142-148. https://doi.org/10.54097/r6k5st06