The Impact of Green Innovation Strategies on Multinational Corporations' Competitive Advantage in Emerging Markets: The Moderating Role of Institutional Pressures and Local Adaptability

Authors

  • Guozhao Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/gmettm30

Keywords:

Green innovation strategy, Multinational enterprises, Emerging markets, Institutional pressure, Local response

Abstract

Against the backdrop of global climate change and resource constraints, the sustainable development of multinational corporations (MNCs) in emerging markets has emerged as a critical theme in international management research. Green innovation strategies are regarded as a vital pathway for achieving triple bottom line objectives and optimizing competitiveness. Using a sample of 326 subsidiaries of multinational corporations operating in four major emerging markets in East and Southeast Asia (China, India, etc.), this study employs hierarchical regression, robustness tests, and endogeneity treatment to examine the impact of green innovation strategies on the competitive advantage of multinational corporations in emerging markets, as well as the moderating effects of institutional pressure and local responsiveness. Green innovation strategies exert a significant positive impact on the competitive advantage of multinational corporations in emerging markets. Institutional pressure positively moderates this relationship: greater institutional pressure amplifies the competitive advantage effect of green innovation. Local responses also positively moderate this relationship: stronger subsidiary adaptability enhances the value conversion efficiency of green innovation. Institutional pressure and local responses exhibit positive interaction; the competitive advantage gain from green innovation is maximized when high pressure and high response overlap. This paper proposes a theoretical model integrating green innovation strategy, institutional pressure, and local response, filling gaps in green innovation research regarding implementation levels. It provides crucial insights for multinational corporations developing green innovation and localization strategies, as well as for host countries in emerging markets optimizing their institutional environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Bu, M., Hatani, F., Holtbrügge, D., Ari Van Assche. 2025. Multinational enterprises and sustainable business in emerging markets. Journal of International Management, 101254–101254. doi:10.1016/j.intman.2025.101254

[2] Liu L. 2023. Green innovation, firm performance, and risk mitigation: evidence from the USA. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26. doi:10.1007/s10668-023-03632-z

[3] Tripopsakul S. 2025. ESG Practices, Green Innovation, and Financial Performance: Panel Evidence from ASEAN Firms. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(8), 467. doi:10.3390/jrfm18080467

[4] Zhang, Q., Zhu, X., Lee, M.-J. 2024. Exploring Institutional Pressures, Green Innovation, and Sustainable Performance: Examining the Mediated Moderation Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation. Sustainability, 16(5), 2058. doi:10.3390/su16052058

[5] Pi, I., Chen, C., Bui, K. 2020. Global integration or local responsiveness? Insights from the case of Chinese MNEs in https://gala.gre.ac.uk/id/eprint/30309/3/30309%20CHEN_Global_Integration_or_Local_Responsiveness_%28AAM%29_2020.pdf

[6] Lopes, J. M., Gomes, S., Pacheco, R., Monteiro, E., Santos, C. 2022. Drivers of Sustainable Innovation Strategies for Increased Competition among Companies. Sustainability, 14(9), 5471. MDPI.

[7] Khan, S. J., Dhir, A., Parida, V., Papa, A. 2021. Past, present, and future of green product innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 4081–4106. doi:10.1002/bse.2858

[8] Qin, X., Muskat, B., Ambrosini, V., Mair, J., Chih, Y.-Y. 2025. Green Innovation Implementation: A Systematic Review and Research Directions. Journal of Management. doi:10.1177/01492063241312656

[9] Rahmani, A., Ali Bonyadi Naeini, Javad Mashayekh, Roohallah Aboojafari, Tugrul Daim, Yalcin, H. 2024. Green Innovation for a Greener Future: A Meta-Analysis of the Impact on Environmental Performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 460, 142547–142547. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.142547

[10] Tu, Y., Wu, W. 2021. How does green innovation improve enterprises’ competitive advantage? The role of organizational learning. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26(1), 504–516. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550920314305

[11] Qi, G., Jia, Y., Zou, H. 2021. Is institutional pressure the mother of green innovation? Examining the moderating effect of absorptive capacity. Journal of Cleaner Production, 278, 123957. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123957

[12] Galli Geleilate, J.-M., Andrews, D. S., Fainshmidt, S. 2019. Subsidiary autonomy and subsidiary performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of World Business, 55(4), 101049. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2019.101049

[13] De Marchi, V., Cainelli, G., Grandinetti, R. 2022. Multinational subsidiaries and green innovation. International Business Review, 102027. doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2022.102027

[14] Blind, K., Jastram, S. M., Müller, J.-A. 2024. SUBSIDIARY STRATEGY AND IMPORTANCE OF STANDARDS: AN INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE INTEGRATION-RESPONSIVENESS FRAMEWORK. European Management Journal. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2024.10.001

[15] Liakh, O., Spigarelli, F. 2020. Managing Corporate Sustainability and Responsibility Efficiently: A Review of Existing Literature on Business Groups and Networks. Sustainability, 12(18), 7722. MDPI. doi:10.3390/su12187722

[16] Wut, T. M., Wong, H. S., Chan, E. A. 2024. Perceived multinational subsidiary autonomy and local commitment to corporate social responsibility in China. Asia Pacific Management Review, 30(1), 100352. doi:10.1016/j.apmrv.2024.100352

[17] Maksimov, V., Wang, S. L., Yan, S. 2019. Global Connectedness and Dynamic Green Capabilities in MNEs. Journal of International Business Studies, 53. doi:10.1057/s41267-019-00275-z

[18] Luan, D., Cao, H., Qu, T. 2023. How Does Corporate Green Innovation Strategy Translate into Green Innovation Performance Based on Chain Mediation? Sustainability, 15(16), 12507–12507. doi:10.3390/su151612507

[19] Ruan, L., Yang, L., Dong, K. 2024. Corporate green innovation: The influence of ESG information disclosure. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 9(4), 100628–100628. doi:10.1016/j.jik.2024.100628

[20] Yang, P., Sun, W., Dai, Y. 2024. The effect of ESG ratings on corporate green innovation strategies: evidence from China. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 1–20. doi:10.1080/13547860.2024.2424663

[21] Zhi, K., Sun, Y., Zhao, H., Zhang, C., Peng, H., Yang, X. 2020. Self-assembled supramolecular material derived from traditional Chinese medicine: Injectable self-assembled natural product gel for drug delivery with biological activity. Materials Today Communications, 23, 101149–101149. doi:10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.101149

Downloads

Published

20-01-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Wang, G. (2026). The Impact of Green Innovation Strategies on Multinational Corporations’ Competitive Advantage in Emerging Markets: The Moderating Role of Institutional Pressures and Local Adaptability. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 22(1), 31-41. https://doi.org/10.54097/gmettm30