Campaign Critique: The Strategic “Marriage” of Duolingo and Luckin Coffee (2025)

Authors

  • Shuling Zhang School of the Arts & Media, The University of New South Wales, Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/s5p0e681

Keywords:

Joint marketing, Meme subculture, Brand community, Public relations, Pseudo-event, Uses and gratifications, Strategic communication

Abstract

This article makes a critical public relations analysis of the 2025 joint marketing campaign of Duolingo and Luckin Coffee in China. Although the “marriage” narrative has successfully exploited the subculture and algorithm fluctuations of the network to achieve huge digital exposure and short-term sales surge. But in-depth analysis shows that it has obvious public relations limitations. The campaign simplifies the complex audience into simple “meme-consumers”, prioritizing superficial influence over sustainable community building, and covering up Duolingo’s core educational values through the risk of missing information. The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the key gap between performance digital indicators and long-term reputation capital. To achieve this goal, the evaluation is based on three core theoretical frameworks: spreadable media, pseudo-events, and brand community definitions. Finally, it makes strategic proposals to shift from symbolic narratives to functional and relationship driven ecosystems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Luckin Coffee. (2025). Luckin Coffee announces third quarter 2025 interim results / Quarterly results and strategic expansion update. https://investor.lkcoffee.com

[2] Jenkins, H. (2006). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York University Press.

[3] Hasan, M. J. (2024). Business case study: Duolingo — Gamifying education and building a habit-forming empire. Medium. https://muhammadjubairhasan.medium.com

[4] QianGua Data. (2025). Data insight report: Social media performance analysis of the "Duo-Lucky Wedding" campaign. https://app.qian-gua.com

[5] Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1973). Uses and gratifications theory. Public Opinion Quarterly, 37(4), 509–523.

[6] McAlexander, J. H., Schouten, J. W., & Koenig, H. F. (2002). Building brand community. Journal of Marketing, 66(1), 38–54.

[7] Jenkins, H., Ford, S., & Green, J. (2013). Spreadable media: Creating value and meaning in a networked culture. New York University Press.

[8] Berger, J. (2016). Contagious: Why things catch on. Simon and Schuster.

[9] Boorstin, D. J. (2012). The image: A guide to pseudo-events in America. Vintage.

[10] Duolingo. (2025, July 8). We are married. Xiaohongshu. http://xhslink.com/o/A1M3LO17XQY

Downloads

Published

14-08-2026

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Zhang, S. (2026). Campaign Critique: The Strategic “Marriage” of Duolingo and Luckin Coffee (2025). Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 24(2), 113-116. https://doi.org/10.54097/s5p0e681