Application of Time Series Models in Stock Price Prediction
Taking the CSI 300 Index as an Example
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/vg99er09Keywords:
Time series forecasting, Stock prices, Random walk, ARIMA model, GARCH model, Long short term memory network, Rolling validationAbstract
Stock price prediction has long been a challenge in financial research due to the high noise, non stationarity, and weak predictability of the data. This paper uses daily market data of the CSI 300 Index from January 2020 to December 2025 as a sample. Under a rolling expansion window framework that strictly eliminates forward looking bias, it systematically compares the predictive performance of five types of time series models: random walk, ARIMA, GARCH, XGBoost, and LSTM. The results show that: random walk constitutes a formidable baseline in short term prediction; ARIMA has notable cost effectiveness in stable phases but underperforms when facing sudden fluctuations; the GARCH family of models has irreplaceable value in risk management; XGBoost has the best robustness in medium term prediction; and LSTM leads in multi step prediction but has limited economic relevance. Further testing by market phase reveals that simple models have the highest cost effectiveness in low volatility periods, while the advantages of nonlinear models only become apparent in high volatility periods. Based on this, this paper proposes a hierarchical prediction framework of "baseline monitoring—volatility calibration—nonlinear correction," emphasizing that the true value of the model lies in probabilistic state reference rather than precise price prediction.
Downloads
References
[1] Cont, R. (2001). Empirical properties of asset returns: Stylized facts and statistical issues. Quantitative Finance, 1(2), 223–236.
[2] Chen, T., & Guestrin, C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. CoRR, abs/1603.02754.
[3] Fischer, T., & Krauss, C. (2018). Deep learning with long short‑term memory networks for financial market predictions. European Journal of Operational Research, 270(2), 654–669.
[4] Sezer, O. B., Gudelek, M. U., & Ozbayoglu, A. M. (2020). Financial time series forecasting with deep learning: A systematic literature review: 2005–2019. Applied Soft Computing, 90, 106181.
[5] Bergmeir, C., & Benítez, J. M. (2012). On the use of cross‑validation for time series predictor evaluation. Information Sciences, 191, 192–213.
[6] Makridakis, S., Spiliotis, E., & Assimakopoulos, V. (2018). Statistical and machine learning forecasting methods: Concerns and ways forward. PLOS ONE, 13(3), e0194889, [https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194889](https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194889).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







