A Comparative Study on Grassland Ecological Protection and Sustainable Development of Herders in China and Mongolia
From the Perspective of International Law and Global Governance under UNCCD COP17
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/91qk2k86Keywords:
Grassland ecological protection, Sustainable development of herders, Mobile wisdom, Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK), UNCCD-COP17, Land Degradation Neutrality (LDN), Transboundary global governance, China and MongoliaAbstract
The Mongolian Plateau grassland, a typical arid semi arid grassland ecosystem in Eurasia, spans both China and Mongolia. It jointly bears the multiple pressures of climate change, grassland degradation, and intensifying desertification, where herder livelihood security and regional ecological security are deeply intertwined. The 17th Session of the Conference of the Parties (COP17) to the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), themed "Restoring Land, Rekindling Hope," launched the "Rangelands Priority Initiative." Coinciding with the United Nations' 2026 International Year of Rangelands and Pastoralists (IYRP), and drawing upon the UNCCD treaty text and the SDG 15.3 Land Degradation Neutrality (LDN) target, this conference has explicitly affirmed the policy value of grassland ecological restoration, indigenous pastoral wisdom, community agency, and transboundary collaborative governance at the levels of multilateral international law and global governance. Grassland ecological protection and the sustainable development of herders constitute a two-way coupled relationship within the grassland social-ecological system: grassland is the material foundation for herder sustainable development, while herders are the core practicing subjects of grassland protection. A bidirectional transmission exists between them, potentially leading either to a vicious cycle of "degradation — poverty" or fostering a virtuous cycle of "ecological improvement — livelihood enhancement." According to the UNCCD's Global Land Outlook – Thematic Report on Rangelands and Pastoralists, approximately 40% of the global land area has experienced some degree of land degradation, with over 3.2 billion people directly bearing the survival pressures caused by land degradation, which results in an estimated global economic loss of up to US$878 billion annually. Globally, rangelands cover 54% of the land surface, sustaining the livelihoods of about 2 billion people; nearly half of these rangelands are already degraded or at risk of degradation, yet only 24 countries have included rangelands in their national climate plans. For a long time, rangeland issues have remained marginalized within the global climate and land governance framework. This paper adopts the analytical perspective of pastoral "mobile wisdom." Grounded in the mandatory obligations of the UNCCD and the LDN target of SDG 15.3, and integrating treaty provisions with the soft law guidance of COP decisions, it systematically analyzes the interaction mechanisms between grassland ecological protection and herder sustainable development. It compares the institutional practices of grassland ecological protection in China and Mongolia: China pursues a governance path driven by national projects and underpinned by institutional safeguards, relying on policies such as "Grazing Withdrawal for Grassland Restoration" and the "Grassland Ecological Protection Subsidy and Reward Policy" to achieve synergistic improvement of ecological restoration and herder livelihoods. Mongolia constructs a governance model combining legal-economic constraints and community-based self-governance, utilizing the Livestock Tax Law and Pasture User Groups (PUGs) to revitalize indigenous pastoral traditions. The study finds that the differences in the governance approaches of the two countries stem from variations in institutional foundations, resource endowments, and social structures. The mobility mindset embedded in Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) represents a core source of resilience for arid grasslands in coping with climate uncertainty. Grounded in the UNCCD-COP17 international law framework, this paper proposes countermeasures such as establishing a cross-border ecological monitoring network, jointly building ecological protection corridors, promoting the integration of traditional ecological knowledge with modern science and technology, and deepening ecological cooperation under the Green Silk Road. These proposals aim to provide theoretical references and practical pathways for the collaborative protection of transboundary grasslands on the Mongolian Plateau and for fulfilling LDN implementation targets.
Downloads
References
[1] National Forestry and Grassland Administration. (2026, August 31). Summary of UNCCD COP17 conference outcomes. http://www.forestry.gov.cn/
[2] UNCCD Secretariat. (2026). The rangelands priority initiative [Report]. UNCCD COP17, Ulaanbaatar.
[3] Narengao, W. (2026). A comparative study on grassland ecological protection and herder sustainable development in China and Mongolia [Report]. COP17 Side Event Report.
[4] UNCCD. (2026). Ulaanbaatar declaration [Report].
[5] Enhe. (2025). A comparative study on the ecological protection roles of herding households in the contiguous grasslands of China and Mongolia. Journal of Inner Mongolia University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 56(02), 45 53.
[6] Zhang, X. S. (2023). Degradation and restoration pathways of the Mongolian plateau grassland ecosystem. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 47(05), 621 632.
[7] Ao, R. Q., & Wen, M. (2013). An inquiry into the relationship between changes in resource utilization modes and socio economic vulnerability. Journal of Guangxi University for Nationalities (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 35(04), 112 117.
[8] Da, L. T., & Zheng, Y. S. (2010). Pastoral areas and markets – Herder economy and grassland ecological changes. Social Sciences Academic Press.
[9] Dong, Y., Batunashun, & Hu, Y. C. (2019). Spatiotemporal analysis of grassland carrying capacity on the Mongolian plateau based on supply consumption relationships. Journal of Natural Resources, 34(06), 1595 1606.
[10] Wulan, T. Y. (2021). Characteristics of grassland utilization on the Mongolian plateau and their national differences. Acta Geographica Sinica, 76(07), 1742 1756.
[11] Huang, Z. P., & Li, Q. F. (2024). Current situation and problems of grassland agricultural development in Mongolia and their implications for China. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 33(03), 1 12.
[12] Wu, J. W., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Compliance barriers and generation mechanisms of grassland grazing ban and rest grazing policies. Journal of Beijing Forestry University (Social Sciences), 23(02), 48 56.
[13] Suyalaqiqige. (2023). A study on the resilience of the grassland social ecological system on the Mongolian plateau from the perspective of traditional ecological knowledge (Master’s thesis). Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot.
[14] Bao'anadou. (2025). A study on pastoral mobile wisdom and the modern transformation of grassland ecological governance. Journal of North Minzu University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), (01), 89 97.
[15] United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2025). Reviving the steppe: Mongolia's living laboratory for combating desertification [Report]. UNDP, New York.
[16] Fernández Giménez, M. E. (2019). Opportunities to integrate herders' indicators into formal rangeland monitoring: An example from Mongolia. Ecology and Society, 24(3), 21.
[17] Boldbaatar, B., & Dorjsuren, B. (2024). The role of traditional ecological knowledge, given the transformation of pastoralism in Central and Eastern Mongolia. Pastoralism: Research, Policy and Practice, 14(1), 1 14.
[18] Chan, F. K. S., Chen, J., Li, P., et al. (2023). The cross boundary of land degradation in Mongolia and China and achieving its neutrality – Challenges and opportunities. Ecological Indicators, 151, 110311.
[19] He, B., Tuya, W., Qinchaoketu, S., et al. (2022). Climate change characteristics of typical grassland in the Mongolian plateau from 1978 to 2020. Sustainability, 14(24), 16529.
[20] Zhen, L., Du, B. Z., & Hu, Y. F. (2018). Comparison of ecosystem services provided by grasslands with different utilization patterns in China's Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 28(10), 1399 1414.
[21] Liu, X. M., & Chen, J. (2022). A study on transboundary ecological security cooperation between China and Mongolia under the framework of the Green Silk Road. Journal of Desert Research, 42(04), 245 254.
[22] Qian, G. X., Hao, Y. H., & Wu, D. (2013). Analysis of poverty situation and causes in rural and pastoral areas of Inner Mongolia. Journal of Inner Mongolia University (Philosophy and Social Sciences), 45(05), 38 43.
[23] UNCCD Secretariat. (2024). Global land outlook – Thematic report on rangelands and pastoralists [Report]. UNCCD, Bonn.
[24] Zheng, X. Y., Lü, N., & Zhang, L. (2023). Land degradation neutrality assessment – A case study of the Mongolian plateau. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 43(23), 9681 9691.
[25] Wang, Y., Huang, K., Bai, X. W., et al. (2023). Construction of China's sandy land monitoring system based on the global LDN monitoring framework and its effectiveness evaluation. Journal of Desert Research, 43(01), 169 178.
[26] United Nations General Assembly. (2025). Resolution 79/294: Proclamation of 2026 as the International Year of Rangelands and Pastoralists [Resolution]. United Nations, New York.
[27] United Nations. (1994). United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification [Treaty].
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.







