Life Cycle, Equity Incentives and Innovation

Authors

  • Shen Xu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/fbem.v7i3.5459

Keywords:

Equity Incentive, Life cycle, Innovation performance, Stock option, Restricted stock.

Abstract

Drawing on and combining with relevant theories such as contingency thinking, life cycle and principal-agent, this paper puts forward the assumption that the impact of equity incentive on innovation performance will fluctuate due to the heterogeneity of life cycle. Moreover, a large number of practice results also show that at different stages of development, companies will have different heterogeneous equity incentive methods. This paper takes A-share listed companies from 2007 to 2019 as the research object, analyzes and discusses the following contents by using the empirical research method and Stata17.0 software, and sets the dependent variable and independent variable as innovation performance, and the intensity and mode of equity incentive respectively: (1) The innovation performance of A-share listed enterprises is affected by the equity incentive model; (2) What kind of impact will different life cycle stages have on the relationship between innovation performance and equity incentive of A-share listed companies; (3) What kind of impact will different life cycle stages have on the relationship between equity incentive models and innovation performance of A-share listed enterprises.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bryan S, Hwang L S, Lilien S. CEO Stock-Based Compensation: An Empirical Analysis of Incentive-Intensity, Relative Mix, and Economic Determinants. Journal of Business, 2000, 73(4): 661-693.

Habib, A., M. M. Hasan. Corporate Life Cycle Research in Accounting, Finance and Corporate Governance: A Survey and Directions for Future Research. International Review of Financial Analysis, 2019, 61(C): 188~201.

Hasan, M. M. Organization Capital and Firm Life Cycle. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2018, 48(2): 556~578.

Hayes, D. C. The Contingency Theory of Managerial Accounting. The Accounting Review, 1977, 52(1): 22~39.

Koh, S. K., R. B. Durand, L. Dai. 2015. Financial Distress: Life cycle and Corporate Restructuring. Journal of Corporate Finance, 1977, 33(3): 19~33.

Nguyen, T. CEO Incentives and Corporate Innovation. Financial Review, 2018, 53(2): 255~300.

Shi Qi, Xiao Shufang, Wu Jiaying. Stock Options, Contract Elements Design and Corporate Innovation Output: Research Based in Risk-taking and Performance-based Incentive Effect. Nankai Business Review, 2020, 23(02): 27-38+62.

Wang, G., P. Singh. The Evolution of CEO Compensation over the Organizational Life Cycle: A Contingency Explanation. Human Resource Management Review, 2014, 24(2): 144~159.

Xiang Yan. The Influence of the Life Cycle Theory on the Core Competitiveness of Enterprises. Economic Research Guide, 2020(30): 3-4.

Zhang, X. Application and Comparative Analysis of B-S Option Pricing Model in Equity Incentive Scheme of Huayu Automobile. Times Finance, 2015(05): 198-199.

Downloads

Published

26-02-2023

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Xu, S. (2023). Life Cycle, Equity Incentives and Innovation. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 7(3), 173-177. https://doi.org/10.54097/fbem.v7i3.5459