Research on the Application of Relatively Centralized Exercise of Administrative Punishment System Right in Urban Management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/fbem.v8i2.6871Keywords:
Relatively centralized administrative punishment system, Urban management, Administrative law enforcement.Abstract
City is an important carrier of economic and social development, a symbol of human civilization and progress. Urban management is an important guarantee to give full play to the function of city carrier, and an important function and eternal topic of people's government. At present, the relatively centralized administrative punishment system of urban management in China has been popularized and applied, but there are still some problems. The relatively centralized punishment system is an important part of urban management reform, which can not only improve urban management problems, but also have important significance for deepening the reform of administrative management system to a certain extent. This paper expounds the connotation of the relatively centralized administrative punishment system, and probes into the problems existing in the relatively centralized administrative punishment system in urban management at present, so as to put forward feasible suggestions on how to apply the relatively centralized administrative punishment system in urban management, hoping to make reference for reform practice.
Downloads
References
Chen Tianxiang, Qi Zhuo, Wang Guoying. Why is it difficult to reform the system of relatively centralized administrative punishment? -Analysis from the perspective of institutional cost [J]. Journal of Jiangsu Institute of Administration, 2019,9(1):8.
Wang Jingbo. Research on the reform of relatively centralized administrative punishment [J]. China Law, 2015,5(4):20.
Xu Xiaoming. The inherent orientation and implementation path of the system of administrative punishment sinking township streets [J]. academic journal of zhongzhou, 2022,4 (4): 43-49.
Xiao Jinming. The combination of three orientations of administrative law enforcement system reform [J]. People's Forum, 2017(10):1.
Tao Zhen. The institutional change and governance logic of comprehensive law enforcement in metropolis management-taking Shanghai as an example [J]. Journal of Shanghai Administration College, 2017,6(1):10.
Hu Mengyao. Normative review and system construction of the system during administrative punishment [J]. Forum on Political Science and Law, 2023, 41(1):14.
Liu Yunmao, Fang Hongli, Bu Lihui. On the three-day application period in the hearing procedure of tax administrative punishment-suggestions on the design of the hearing right procedure under the background of "running at most once" reform [J]. Tax Research, 2019(9):7.
Pan Yunhua. Research on law enforcement related issues of "urban management"-based on relevant judicial cases in W city [J]. journal of hubei administration institute, 2016,3(6):5.
Wu Jia. Research on the Problems and Countermeasures in the Implementation of Article 64 of the Urban and Rural Planning Law-Talking from the Guiding Opinions on Regulating the Discretion of Administrative Punishment in Urban and Rural Planning [J]. Urban Planning, 2015,2 (3): 6.
Chen Yue. Cheapsism Approach to Perfect Administrative Punishment System [J]. Journal of Suzhou University: Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition, 2020, 41(2):10.
Lu Fang, Zhou Xunfang, Zhu Jiang. Practice and perfection of administrative discretion benchmark system in forestry administrative punishment [J]. Journal of Beijing Forestry University: Social Science Edition, 2016, 15(4):8.
