How to Realize the Blended Value of Social Enterprise Resource Integration?
Based on the Investigation of Organizational Legitimacy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/fbem.v8i2.6983Keywords:
Social Enterprise, Resource Integration, Blended Value, Legitimacy.Abstract
In recent years, social enterprises have developed by leaps and bounds, involving more fields with a profound social impact in the sector of national non-governmental public welfare. However, the development of social enterprises in China is still in the initial stage, encountering the challenges such as legal legitimacy, moral legitimacy, and cognitive legitimacy. The purpose of this paper is to review the concept of social enterprises, analyze the implementation of the “New Citizen Plan” which is an activity of the Nandu Public Welfare, and the problems faced by the development of domestic social enterprises from the perspective of blended value and the triangular relationship of social enterprises. Finally, referring to the development models of social enterprises in other countries, this paper puts forward some suggestions for future development from the aspects of government and social enterprises. On the one hand, the government should optimize the environment, integrate resources, and provide normative legal support in a macro manner to promote the sustainable development of social enterprises in China. On the other hand, social enterprises should accurately identify the environment from a micro perspective and carry out precise positioning. Through in-depth cooperation and innovation, a win-win result for public welfare and commerce will be achieved, offering more ideas for the growth of social enterprises.
Downloads
References
Xu, Y. G. (2017). Public welfare to the right, business to the left: Social enterprise and social influence investment. Beijing: CITIC Press Group, 8.
Tian, X. Y. & Zhao, C. Y. (2020). Development status and its enlightenment of social enterprises in China: An international comparison. Social Policy Research, (04), 121-136.
Wang, D. N. & Wang, Z. P. (2020). Problems and countermeasures of the development of social enterprises in China. China Journal of Commerce, (22), 179-180 + 191.
Zhang, Q. (2021). Social enterprises participating in community public service: Internal logic, mode choice, and practical path. Journal of Liaoning Academy of Governance, (01), 70-76. DOI:10.13945/j.cnki.jlac.2021.01.013.
Lei, W. Y. (2021). “COVID-19 crisis” and “innovative changes”—Responses and enlightenment of Australian social enterprise under COVID-19. Economic Forum, (02), 52-59.
Deleuze. (2021). New attribute of “social enterprise”. Manager, (01), 18-19.
Ran, Q. (2020). Research on profit distribution of social enterprises. Rural Economy and Science-Technology, 31(21), 182-184.
Wang, Y. (2020). Conflict and integration of institutional logic of social enterprises in China. Research of Administration Science, (11), 42-45.
Zhang, Y. Y. (2020). Literature research on social enterprise theory. Chinese & Foreign Corporate Culture, (09), 84-85.
Liu, L. & Wu, X. T. (2020). “One institution with two names”—The logic of resource bricolage for social enterprises: A dual response to market and institution. Southeast Academic Research, (05), 136-147.
Guan, Y. (2020). Postmodern public welfare phenomenon from the Perspective of Deleuze’s generative theory: Formation of social enterprise in China as an example. Shanghai Culture, (08), 20-29 + 124.
Sun, Y. F. & Li, S. (2012). On the legitimacy of social enterprises. Journal of Social Work, (08), 37-39.
