Comparative Analysis of ESG Information Disclosures

Authors

  • Yiheng Guo
  • Aza Azlina Md Kassim
  • Kai Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/fbem.v8i2.7131

Keywords:

ESG Ratings, Information Disclosure, Rating Agencies.

Abstract

ESG is a framework for the disclosure of non-financial information about companies, an investment philosophy and corporate evaluation criteria that focuses on non-financial performance. ESG ratings are a key part of ESG development, and the current number of global ESG rating agencies, with very different backgrounds and divergent ratings, makes it difficult to generate consensus on the ratings of the same subject. Therefore, on the basis of sorting out the situation of 11 famous ESG rating agencies and comparing and analyzing the ESG evaluation system of each rating agency, the study found that China's existing ESG rating system has core problems such as poor quality of information disclosure, inconsistent ESG rating results and imperfect ESG ecosystem, and accordingly put forward several suggestions for China's future ESG development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Berg, F., Koelbel, J. F., & Rigobon, R. Aggregate confusion[J]: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance, 2022, 26(6), 1315-1344.

Dimson, E., Marsh, P., & Staunton, M. Divergent ESG ratings[J]. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 2020, 47(1), 75-87.

Li, F., & Polychronopoulos, A. What a difference an ESG ratings provider makes[J]. Research affiliates, 2020, 15.

Pagano, M. S., Sinclair, G., & Yang, T. (2018). Understanding ESG ratings and ESG indexes. In Research handbook of finance and sustainability. Edward Elgar Publishing. 2018, 339-371.

Zumente, I., & Lāce, N. ESG Rating—Necessity for the Investor or the Company?[J]. Sustainability, 2021, 13(16), 8940.

Downloads

Published

06-04-2023

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Guo, Y., Md Kassim, A. A., & Zhang, K. (2023). Comparative Analysis of ESG Information Disclosures. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 8(2), 143-146. https://doi.org/10.54097/fbem.v8i2.7131