Research on the Impact of the "Three Powers" Decentralization Reform Policy on the Transformation of Scientific and Technological Achievements in Universities: A Case Study of Hubei Province, China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54097/fbem.v9i1.8692Keywords:
Decentralization of theAbstract
The evaluation of the actual situation of the transformation of scientific and technological achievements in Chinese universities by delegating the "three powers" to universities is of great significance for the formulation and improvement of policies for the transformation of scientific and technological achievements in universities. The article is based on the composite control method and selects multiple provinces in China that have not implemented the "Three Powers Decentralization" policy in university reform pilot projects to simulate the situation where universities in Hubei Province in China have not implemented the policy. The comparison is made with the current "Three Powers Decentralization" policy to highlight the implementation effect of the "Three Powers Decentralization" policy in universities in Hubei Province in China. Research has found that the "three decentralization" reform has a significant promoting effect on the transformation of scientific and technological achievements in universities in Hubei Province. The implementation of the "three decentralization" reform in universities in Hubei Province has a certain degree of policy spillover effect, and has a significant promoting effect on the transformation level of scientific and technological achievements in the entire region. The transformation reform of scientific and technological achievements in universities under the principle of "delegating three powers" has a significant positive promoting effect on the output of scientific and technological achievements in universities in Hubei Province. Based on the research findings, corresponding policy recommendations have been provided for optimizing the transformation plan of scientific and technological achievements in various regions through the exploration of the reform plan in Hubei Province.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Xing Z L, Wu Y J, Sun Y L.Research on the Changing Mode of S&T Achievements Transformation and Countermeasures in China based on the Perspective of Path Evolution [J]. Innovation Science and Technology, 2021,21(08):25-34.
He M. The New "Humanistic Concept" and the Improvement of the Patent System for Service Inventions[J]. Law Science, 2012(09):65-74.
Zhang M S. How to Deal with the Curse of State -Owned Assets Hindering the Technology- Stock —An Example of Mixed Ownership Reform in Chengdu[J]. Reform of Economic System,2017(06):116-123.
Wu W, Meng S S, Xue M L. How to diminish technology transfer barriers: A qualitative research of five double － first class universities[J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2021,39(12):2213-2222.
Wu J L, Y H H, Wang H Q. Research on the Effect of Related Policy Tools Influencing Enterprise Innovation and Entrepreneurship—Based on 278 Enterprises Survey[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2016,33(19):88-93.
Chang X H, Zhao Y Q, Chen Q. An analysis of the influencing factors of university patent transfer performance from the perspective of process management[J]. Science Research Management 2020,41(01):152-160.
Geuna A, Rossi F. Changes to university IPR regulations in Europe and the impact on academic patenting[J]. Research Policy, 2011,40(8):1068-1076.
Ren Z Y, Mei S W. The Influence of Mixed Ownership Scientific and Technological Achievements on the Innovation Efficiency of Colleges and Universities[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2022:1-9.
MOORE A D. Intellectualproperty & information control[M]. Transaction Publisher, 2001.
Liu X, Li T T, Chen G. Did the policy pilots about "mixed － ownership" of on － duty patents work? [J]. Studies in Science of Science, 2020,38(07):1197-1206.
Wirsich A, Kock A, Strumann C,et al. Effects of university industry collaboration on technological newness of firms [J]. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2016,33(6):708-725.
Su Z, Hu D. Is Inflation Targeting Effective?—New Evidence from the Synthetic Control Methods[J]. Economic Research Journal, 2015,50(06):74-88.
Abadie A, Gardeazabal J. The Economic Costs of Conflict: A Case Study of the Basque Country[J]. American Economic Review, 2003,93(1):113-132.
Zhang J Y, Lei L, Gao Wen. Has the Reform of the Decentralization of "Three-rights" Promoted the Performance of Patent Technology Transfer in Research Institutes?: Analysis Based on Synthesis Control Method[J]. Science and Technology Management Research, 2022,42(04):46-52.
Liu Y J, Zeng X M. Research on the Influence of Industrial Transfer from the Property Taxes：Empirical Research from Chongqing and Shanghai[J]. China Industrial Economics, 2018(11):98-116.
Liu J Y, Fan Z Y. Evaluation of the effectiveness of China's real estate tax pilot project: a study based on composite control method[J]. The Journal of World Economy, 2013,36(11):117-135.
Ding J S, Meng W F, Wang Q. Regional Integration，Economic Growth and Ｒegional Differences in the Yangtze Ｒiver Delta — New Evidence from Synthetic Control Method[J]. Soft Science, 2022:1-16.
Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J. Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California's Tobacco Control Program[J]. Publications of the American Statistical Association, 2010,105(490):493-505.
Park J K, Ryu D, Lee K. What determines the economic size of a nation in the world: Determinants of a nation's share in world GDP vs. per capita GDP[J]. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 2019,51.
Luo Q, Gao R R, Cao L N. The Grounded Research of Impact Factors and the Measure Analysis of Transformation Efficiency of Scientific and Technological Achievements in Colleges and Universities—Case Study of Jiangsu Province[J]. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 2018,35(05):43-51.
Wu Y, Wang Y, Zheng J R. Measurement of transformation efficiency of scientific and technological achievements in "Double First -Class" universities —Based on data observations from the 12th Five —Year Plan period to the 13th Five —Year Plan period[J] Scientific Management Research, 2022,40(02):49-56.
Zhong W, Chen B M. Assessment of the Efficiency of Scientific and Technological Achievements Transformation in Chinese Universities[J].Forum on Science and Technology in China, 2018(04):41-49.
Kim Y. The ivory tower approach to entrepreneurial linkage: productivity changes in university technology transfer[J]. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2013,38(2):180-197.
Siegel D, Wright M, Chapple Wet al. Assessing the relative performance of university technology transfer in the US and UK : a stochastic distance function approach [J]. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 2008,17(7-8):717-729.
The Evolution and Impact Factors of University Technology Transfer Efficiency in China: Based on the Method of Bootstrap-DEA and Panel Tobit Model[J]. Science of Science and Management of S.& T, 2013,34(10):85-94.
DEA evaluation of the S＆T achievements transformation efficiency: A study of 24 universities under the Ministry of Education[J]. Science Research Management, 2020, 41 (04): 280-288.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
