Why Stakeholder Theory is “Non-exploitative”

Authors

  • Chenyu Xiao

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/fbem.v9i2.9283

Keywords:

Stakeholder theory, Sustainability, Long-term success, Exploitation.

Abstract

This essay explores the growing interest in stakeholder theory, especially its non-exploitative nature, arising out of the need to contribute to the long-term and sustainable development of corporations. As corporations continue to grow, the traditional shareholder primacy theory is increasingly challenged, many scholars believe that this theory only pays one-sided attention to the benefits of shareholders, leading to the problem of short-term and financialization of corporations. The stakeholder theory, however, takes into account the benefits of customs, manufacturers, and other stakeholders, and better avoids exploitation. However, there are also some criticisms of stakeholder theory. For example, some people argue that the implementation mechanism of stakeholder theory is not feasible, and there are still groups that are not considered under stakeholder theory, so its non-exploitative nature is questioned. Many of the existing papers focus on the content of stakeholder theory and lack to analyze whether it avoids corporate exploitation through a specific interpretation of its content. The emphasis of this essay lies in analyzing the background and content of stakeholder theory and interpreting why it is not exploitative from the two levels, theoretical basis, and practical application, and contributes to the long-term success and win-win relationship of the company. This essay concludes that stakeholder theory can reduce corporate exploitation both in theory and practice, and contribute to the long-term success and sustainable development of corporations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Thomas Donaldson,, and Lee. E. Preston, ‘The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications’ (1995) 20 The Academy of Management Review 65; Freeman R. Edward, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Cambridge University Press 2010)

Donaldson, Thomas, and Lee. E. Preston, ‘The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications’ (1995) 20 The Academy of Management Review 65

R. Edward Freeman and others, Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art (Cambridge University Press 2010)

R. Edward Freeman , stakeholder theory: concepts and strategis (Cambridge University Press 2010)

ibid

Thomas Donaldson, and Lee E. Preston, ‘The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications’ (1995) 20 The Academy of Management Review 65

Li Liu, ‘The Formation and Shortcomings of Stakeholder Theory’ ( 2009) 11 Rule of Law and Society.

R. Edward Freeman ., Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Cambridge University Press 2010).

ibid.

R. Edward Freeman and others, Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art (Cambridge University Press 2010).

R. Edward Freeman stakeholder theory: concepts and strategis (Cambridge University Press 2010)

Clarke Thomas,’The Impact of Financialisation on International Corporate Governance: The Role of Agency Theory and Maximising Shareholder Value’ (2014) 8 Law and financial markets review 39

The Financial Reporting Council Limited, The UK Corporate Governance Code (2018)

Pallidino L. Torwards Accountable Capitalism: Remaking Corporate Law Through Stakeholder Governance ( Report, Feb 11, 2019) https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2019/02/11/towards-accountable-capitalism-remaking-corporate-law-through-stakeholder-governance/ accessed December 11, 2022

R. Edward Freeman , Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Cambridge University Press 2010)

R. Edward Freeman ., Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Cambridge University Press 2010).

ibid.

R. Edward Freeman , stakeholder theory: concepts and strategis (Cambridge University Press 2010)

ibid

R. Edward Freeman and others, Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art (Cambridge University Press 2010)

Margaret M. Blair and, Lynn A. Stout, 'A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law' (2009) 85 Virginia Law Review 247

Hansmann and Kraakman, ‘The End of History for Corporate Law’ (2001) 89 Georgetown LJ 439

R. Edward Freeman , Stakeholder Theory: Concepts and Strategis (Cambridge University Press 2010)

Robert Phillips, R. Edward Freeman and Andrew C. Wicks, “What Stakeholder Theory Is Not” (2003) 13 Business Ethics Quarterly 479

R. Edward Freeman, Stakeholder Theory: Concepts and Strategis (Cambridge University Press 2010)

Thomas Donaldson, and Lee E. Preston, 'The Stakeholder Theory of The Corporation : Concepts, Evidence, and Implications' (1995)

R. Edward Freeman and others, Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art (Cambridge University Press 2010)

Thomas, Clarke, ’The Impact of Financialisation on International Corporate Governance: The Role of Agency Theory and Maximising Shareholder Value’ (2014) 8 Law and financial markets review 39

Margaret M Blair and Lynn A Stout, 'A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law' (2009) 85 Virginia Law Review 247

Ibid

Dodge v. Ford Motor Company [1919] N.W. 668 (MICH)

John P Kotter and Heskett, Corporate Culture and Performance (OUP 2008).

Dodge v. Ford Motor Company [1919] N.W. 668 (MICH)

R Edward Freeman, stakeholder theory: concepts and strategis (Cambridge University Press 2010)

Thomas Donaldson and Lee E Preston, 'The stakeholder theory of the corporation : concepts, evidence, and implications' (1995)

David Wheeler and Maria Sillanpa, ‘Including the Stakeholders: The Business Case' (1998) 31 Long Range Planning 201.

R Edward Freeman, stakeholder theory: concepts and strategis (Cambridge University Press 2010)

[Steve Rowlinson and Yan Ki Fiona Cheung, 'Stakeholder Management through Empowerment: Modelling Project Success' (2008) 26 Construction Management and Economics 611

Margaret M Blair and Lynn A Stout, 'A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law' (2009) 85 Virginia Law Review 247

Margaret M Blair and Lynn A Stout, 'A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law' (2009) 85 Virginia Law Review 247

R Edward Freeman, stakeholder theory: concepts and strategis (Cambridge University Press 2010)

Ibid

Margaret M Blair and Lynn A Stout, 'A Team Production Theory of Corporate Law' (2009) 85 Virginia Law Review 247

R Edward Freeman and others, Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art (Cambridge University Press 2010)

George W Dent, “Academics in Wonderland: The Team Production and Director Primacy Models of Corporate Governance

George Benston and others, ‘Following the Money: The Enron Failure and The State of Corporate Disclosure’ (OUP 2004); Jacob Hörisch, R Edward Freeman and Stefan Schaltegger, 'Applying Stakeholder Theory in Sustainability Management : Links, Similarities, Dissimilarities, and a Conceptual Framework' (2014) 27 Organization & Environment 328

Jiapeng, Ge and Shizhong, Huang, 'Reflections on Enron: An Analysis of the Accounting and Auditing Problems of Enron Company' (2002) 2 Accounting Research Study.

George Benston and others, ‘Following the Money: The Enron Failure and the State of Corporate Disclosure’ (OUP 2004)

Jiapeng, Ge and Shizhong, Huang, 'Reflections on Enron: An Analysis of the Accounting and Auditing Problems of Enron Company' (2002) 2 Accounting Research Study.

Companies Act 2006

R. Edward Freeman, stakeholder theory: concepts and strategis (Cambridge University Press 2010)

Publix beats Wal-Mart to become the most profitable grocer in the US with its own brands (Report, Mar 13, 2018) www.linkshop.com/news/2018398347.shtml accessed December 13, 2022

R. Edward Freeman, stakeholder theory: concepts and strategis (Cambridge University Press 2010)

2011 Catalyst Census: Fortune 500 Women Board Directors (Report, Dec 13,2011) www.catalyst.org/research/2011-catalyst-census-fortune-500-women-board-directors/ accessed December 9, 2022; Richter U.E. and Dow K.E. 'Stakeholder Theory: A Deliberative Perspective' (2017) 26 Business Ethics: A European Review 428.

R Edward Freeman, stakeholder theory: concepts and strategis (Cambridge University Press 2010)

Downloads

Published

12-06-2023

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Xiao, C. (2023). Why Stakeholder Theory is “Non-exploitative”. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management, 9(2), 207-211. https://doi.org/10.54097/fbem.v9i2.9283