Analysis of the Advantages and Disadvantages of Four Comprehensive Evaluation Methods

Mingyang Liu; Wenge Qin; Shuang Yang

doi:10.54097/fbem.v9i3.9578

Authors

Mingyang Liu
Wenge Qin
Shuang Yang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54097/fbem.v9i3.9578

Keywords:

AHP, TOPSIS method, Entropy value method, Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method.

Abstract

This paper introduces the AHP, entropy value method, TOPSIS method and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method in the comprehensive evaluation method, and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the four from the perspectives of subjectivity and objectivity, acceptance of decision makers, and difficulty of evaluation. The value method depends on the amount of initial data, the AHP research results are too subjective, the TOPSIS research conclusions do not fit the reality, and the results of the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation may have poor resolution. Finally, suggestions are put forward for the application scope of the four methods of single use and combined use. It is believed that the four evaluation methods can be combined in pairs or three, such as: entropy weight-TOPSIS, AHP-TOPSIS or entropy weight-AHP -Methods such as fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method avoid being affected by the limitations of a single evaluation method.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

JIA Pin,LI Xiaobin,WANG Jinxiu. Comparison of several typical comprehensive evaluation methods[J].Chinese Hospital Statistics,2008,15(04):351-353.)

LIU Burong,HAN Jing,YANG Li. Evaluation of the competitiveness of urban logistics industry based on entropy weight method[J].Journal of Huainan Normal University, 2019, 21(03): 57-60.

LI Xingqi,GAO Xiaohong. Effectiveness evaluation of dimensionless method[J].Statistics and Decision, 2021, 37(15): 24-28.DOI:10.13546/j.cnki.tjyjc.2021.15.005

Comprehensive evaluation and analysis of private economic development level in Anhui Province based on entropy method and AHP method[D].Anqing Normal University,2020.DOI:10.27761/d.cnki.gaqsf.2020.000110

Çağlar Kıvanç Kaymaz,Salih Birinci,Yusuf Kızı lkan. Correction to: Sustainable development goals assessment of Erzurum province with SWOTAHP analysis[J]. Environment, Development and Sustainability,2021(prepublish).

FU Zhiyang,WANG Tao,KONG Linghao,MA Hao,XU Xiangchu. Evaluation of power consumption status of important power customers based on AHP-TOPSIS algorithm[J/OL].Power System Technology:1-8[2022-03-28]. DOI:10.13335/j.1000-3673.pst.2021.2280.

XU Zhenghua,CAO Yanming. Evaluation of carrying capacity of water resources in Changchun City based on entropy weight TOPSIS model[J/OL].Journal of Safety and Environment:1-10[2022-03-28]. DOI:10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2021.1448.

LI Qin,LI Wenlong,CUI Kai. Decision on recycling scheme of civil buildings based on improved TOPSIS method [J]. Geomatics of Wuhan University (Engineering Science),2022,55(02):160-167.DOI:10.14188/j.1671-8844.2022-02-007

WU Mengfei,LI Bingjun,WEI Xinjuan,YANG Weiming. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of agricultural product circulation efficiency based on entropy weight method:A case study of Henan Province[J].Mathematics in Practice and Understanding,2019,49(13):83-93.)

Xu Peng. Research on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation of agricultural product pledge financing risk based on supply chain finance[J].Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law,2017,19(03):110-118.)

ZHANG Linruo, YAO Zhenghai. Evaluation and coordination degree of cultural tourism industry development in Jiangsu Province[J].Business and Management,2022(02):180-185.DOI:10.16517/j.cnki.cn12-1034/f.2022.02.025

WANG Li. Higher education level evaluation based on PCA-AHP-GABP algorithm[J].Cooperative Economy and Technology, 2021 (11): 105-107.DOI:10.13665/j.cnki.hzjjykj.2021.11.041

MA Yuanyuan,SHANG Meng,LEI Jie,CAO Junwei,MA Yuhao. Research on the current situation and optimization strategy of M school express collection based on AHP[J].China Business Review,2021(09):31-33.DOI:10.19699/j.cnki.issn2096-0298.2021.09.031

Alkan Nurşah,Kahraman Cengiz. Evaluation of government strategies against COVID-19 pandemic using q-rung orthopair fuzzy TOPSIS method [J]. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 2021, 110.

Lo Huai-Wei,Liou James J.H.. Comments on “Factors influencing medical tourism adoption in Malaysia: A DEMATEL-Fuzzy TOPSIS approach” [J]. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2021,157.

CHEN Qiuchan,WANG Shuang. Research on passenger satisfaction of ride-hailing based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation [J]. Modern Business, 2017 (33): 125-127. DOI:10.14097/j.cnki.5392/2017.33.059.

Wang Yuan. Research on tourism public service quality evaluation based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method [D]. Hainan University,2017.

Zhan Shaowen, Zi Ji. Research on rural public service quality evaluation index system based on AHP-fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method[J].Business and Management, 2021 (07): 168-174.